to open Pandora's Apartheid Box - Part 1 By Mike Smith 22nd of April
[Complete 'Pandora's Apartheid Box' Archived in PDF at
When we were children. We could never understand what the
church minister meant when he said that all sins are sins and all sins
are equally bad. It did not make sense to us, because telling a lie is
not as bad as murdering someone...or is it? Personally I believe that
lying is far more dangerous than murder. Lying can kill entire
civilisations. You see...Lying is an art. There are many facets to it,
but basically successful lying works like this: You start with a
massive lie. Some idiots will believe it, some will be mildly sceptic
and a few intelligent ones will dismiss it as hogwash. Then you tone
the lie down a bit, and those mildly sceptic ones becomes believers
and the few intelligent ones who thought they knew the truth start
doubting themselves and think, "OK, some of it might be true, but
it is mostly bullshit". And so it carries on...you tone the lie
down a little bit more until everyone accepts it as the truth. See,
people do not believe lies, because they have to, but , because they
want to...But there are lies and then there are statistics...and then
there is the truth. And that is what I profess to. And so the lie of
Apartheid and everything about it was started as a massive lie until
Apartheid was accepted as a crime against humanity on the 30th of
The Crime of Apartheid Was it a Crime? A Crime
against humanity?...or was it the fairest system ever created for
multicultural societies? These are the questions I want to explore in
a series of articles. "Why", you ask? This so called "Crime
of Apartheid" is a daemon released from Pandora's Box. It has far
reaching consequences that were previously not considered.
It has consequences and it is making people nervous...everyone from
international corporations, international church organisations to
sovereign nations are currently biting their nails... What is the
motivation to open Pandora's Box? Does common sense not tell you to
rather keep it shut? Do you really want to see how deep the rabbit
When it comes to "The Crime of Apartheid",
the only motivation is GREED. So who are these greedy people brave
enough to open Pandora's Apartheid Box? They are called The Khulumani
support group Khulumani means "To speak out" in the Zulu
Language. So let us speak out. Let us not hold back anymore. Let us
not pay 20,000 blacks R30,000 "restitution for suffering under
Apartheid" like the ANC did after the TRC (Truth and
To understand it better I
have to take you back a while to when us whites willingly handed power
over to the Blacks in 1994... We thought we had an honest deal. The
deal was actually simple. We wanted the international community to
lift all economic and sport sanctions against us so we could play
Rugby and take part in the Olympics. In exchange we asked the ANC to
stop planting bombs in shopping centres and landmines on farm roads,
we told the international community that we were willing to bury the
hatchet with the ANC, provided they do the same. We wanted to bury
Apartheid and build a fantastic country all working together to make
the country even stronger than what it was. We thought it was
achievable, because we always got on well with our Black domestics in
our homes or our black colleagues at work. We knew nothing about the
communist agitations happening in the townships.
Most of us,
were political dunces at the time. Our political beliefs were very
liberal after we left (brainwashing) school and entered the realm of
Liberal activist student politics. The reality was that when we buried
the hatchet, the ANC continued the struggle. They have not at the
time, neither now achieved their ultimate goal, which is a total
communist South Africa...and therefore will continue the struggle
until there is not a single white person left in South Africa.
did I realise that the ANC was continuing the struggle? I saw it with
the TRC, I saw it with the introduction of Affirmative Action and
Black Economic Empowerment. I saw that the ANC was not willing to let
it all go. They were not interested in burying the hatchet. The ANC
was not interested in "A better life for all". The ANC was
only interested in making as much money for themselves and screw the
rest of all South Africans, Black or White. The ANC equals Greed.
Nothing will ever be enough. You cannot bargain or deal with them,
because they will take everything you put on the table and demand
more. It is futile to deal with these Marxist terrorists. Dealing with
them will mean you will lose everything you have and they will not
give up a single thing they have. You will keep on giving until you
have nothing more to give, at which point you become expendable. That
is when they will kill you. We as ordinary whites in South Africa are
fast approaching that stage. Along came the TRC who paid blacks in
South Africa R30.000 each for their bullshit stories about how
Apartheid oppressed them. The oppression and benefits will be dealt
with in another article, but as far as I am concerned, when someone
offers me R30,000 then I can also suck a brilliant story of oppression
out of my thumb. Make the sum people. R30,000 paid out to about 20
thousand black??? R600,million...is that enough?
So to take
stock. We thought it was enough to hand over our country that we built
with our money and our expertise. We thought it was enough to give
them a first world country with a nuclear and space program. We
identified every single black who supposedly suffered under Apartheid,
we believed all their lies all 20,000 who came forward, we paid them
restitution of R30,000 each... But let me tell you, it was not enough,
It will never be enough with these Marxist terrorist scum. No, they
want blood. They want us to pay in blood...to the very last
drop...more on that later. They have started a court case in the USA
against international companies who benefited from Apartheid. They
name Land Rover (Leyland) and Mercedes who supplied vehicles to patrol
the townships, they mention Oil companies such as Royal Dutch Shell
who ironically donated their headquarters in SA to the ANC that is now
called Luthuli House. They name Barclays Bank who withdrew from SA and
at the same time changed their name to First National Bank and
continued to fund the ANC. These same ANC scum now turns against their
international masters and demands restitution.
about countries that supported the previous National Party? We
immediately think of Taiwan and Israel? Surely if you can claim
restitution from international corporations who supported Apartheid
then you can also claim restitution from countries who supported the
Apartheid government at the time. See, what I mean about opening
Pandora's Apartheid Box? The ANC should have left sleeping dogs lying,
but no, greed has no brakes... So let us see where this journey takes
us. Let us see how deep the rabbit hole goes. At the end of this
series you will see that we never had any friends, nobody had any
friends. Nobody is friends currently and nobody will ever be friends
with anybody. Everybody lies about everyone else. The biggest lie is
the one that everyone believes about Apartheid. These scavenges are
all in it for the money and the power. It is a dog eat dog world out
there my friends, and we as White South Africans chose to be the EPOL
Opening Pandora's Apartheid Box - Part 2 - What "diversity"
means in South Africa
Nobody can understand Apartheid unless
they understand the diversity of the people of South Africa. Let us
start with the whites. In South Africa there are several groups of
whites. The two main groups are the Afrikaans speaking and the English
speaking ones. The Afrikaners are the descendants from mainly Dutch,
Flemish, French, German and some other Western European backgrounds.
The Afrikaners have a unique culture, their own language and they are
mostly protestant. The English speaking whites of South Africa are
from mostly British background. They are made up of English, Scots,
Welsh and Irish descendants...as well as a large contingent of ex
Rhodesians. These English speaking Whites of South Africa can today
not be referred to as British anymore. Very few hold British
passports. They developed a unique accent and culture in South Africa
and are fully South African today. Their forefathers came to South
Africa long before there were any Whites in Australia or New Zealand.
South Africa also has other large white communities such as the
Portuguese (300,000), the Greek (+/- 100,000) and the Jewish
communities (70,000). They all have their own religions and cultures.
The Portuguese are mostly Catholic, the Greeks are orthodox Christians
and the Jews are mostly orthodox Jewish.
Africa has a Chinese population who arrived around 1870 to work in the
gold mines until Chinese immigration was stopped by an exclusion act
in 1904. The South African Chinese community is about 300,000 strong.
The Cape coloureds are also diverse and complex from a wide variety of
backgrounds. Today there are the two main groups, Christians and
Muslims. There is about 4 million coloureds in total. It is commonly
understood by most foreigners and also amongst many South Africans,
that the coloureds are a mixture of Black and White ancestors. This is
The coloureds as a group existed long before the
Whites saw any Blacks for the first time around 1770 in the Eastern
Cape about 1000km from Cape Town. This was 120 years after the Dutch
settled at the Cape (1652). The indigenous people of the Cape were the
Khoi Khoi(Hottentots). They were almost 90% annihilated by a smallpox
epidemic at the Cape (1703). The Dutch also imported artisans such as
bricklayers, carpenters, etc from Malaysia and Indonesia. These were
the Muslims or Cape Malay people. The KhoiKhoi and the Cape Malay also
intermarried and interbred. A small percentage of Whites also married
coloureds, but it was actually very rare. A large amount of the
passing sailors frequented coloured prostitutes. Today the Cape
Coloured features vary from dark brown to almost White or yellow and
their hair vary from peppercorn curly to straight black. Some have
KhoiKhoi features and some Arabic or Malaysian. Today the Muslim and
Christian coloureds have distinct and different cultures. Some speak a
dialect of Afrikaans and some English.
In Natal we find most
of South Africa's Indian population. They total about one million and
are descendants of indentured labourers (for the sugar cane
plantations) and traders from India and Sri Lanka. They speak mostly
English, but many still speak Tamil, Hindi or Urdu. Their religion is
mostly Hindu but many are Muslim. So far I have not even started with
the blacks yet. Most foreigners believe that South Africa has one
group of Blacks that speak one language and have one culture. Nothing
could be further from the truth. South Africa's Black population is
not homogenous. There are several different tribes who all speak
different languages and who have distinct and hugely different
There are main tribes such as the Zulu, Xhosa,
Tswana, Venda, Ndebele, Sotho, Swazi and the Shangaan/Tsonga people.
But it does not stop there, because these main tribes consist of
smaller tribes. For instance the Xhosas are made up of Mpondo, Fingo,
Thembu, Bhaca, Nhlangwini and Xesibe tribes. The Sothos are made up of
North Sotho (Bapedi) and South Sotho (Basotho) tribes. The Tswanas are
only a part of the main tribe known as the West Sotho. Other tribes
that make up the West Sotho are the Kwena, Kgatla, Tlhaping, Tlharo,
Rolong and Ngwato. The Venda tribe is made up of mainly the Mphephu
and the Lemba, but in total the Vavenda can be bordered off into 27
clearly distinguishable tribes. The Zulus are made up of about 200
smaller tribes The Swazis are made up from the Nkosi, Shongwe, Khumalo
and Hhlatyawako tribes. The Northern Sothos are made up from the Pedi,
Koni, Phalaborwa, Lobedu and Kutswe tribes.... And so I can go on.
in all South Africa has nine official Black languages, with 23 sub
categories and innumerable dialects. Yes, these different tribes of
South Africa all have different languages, cultures and belief
systems. The Vendas for instance have a special affinity to
crocodiles. The Zulus consider themselves as a warrior tribe and they
do not circumcise their boys when they are initiated into manhood,
they have to kill a bull with their bare hands. The Xhosas on the
other hand do circumcise their boys and therefore Xhosas consider
Zulus as mere boys regardless of their age. When a Xhosa and a Zulu
work together and they have words, the Xhosa will first and always
accuse a Zulu of being a boy, thus not a man.
remarkable piece of information that very few people know about is
that the Lemba people who form part of the Venda tribe are JEWISH. No.
They did not convert to Judaism after meeting some Jewish immigrants
to South Africa. President Kruger found them already with their Jewish
belief system going back more than two thousand years. They migrated
from the Kenya or Ethiopian regions. South Africa's black Jews I hope
that the reader can see that South Africa is a palette of people,
cultures and religions, but also note that I started with the white
people who were leading in the atomic age into Africa and I ended with
Blacks who are for all intents and purposes still nomadic Negro tribes
stuck in the stone-age. With this background, is it really so
unimaginable and difficult to understand that the way of "Separate
development" (Apartheid) was the best and fairest solution for
the problems of South Africa?
Opening Pandora's Apartheid
Box - Part 3 - The violent nature of Blacks. First rationale for
Many white South Africans feel guilty about
Apartheid, they feel as if they actually did something evil or bad,
but that is totally wrong. Ex president De Klerk apologised for
Apartheid and so did the Dutch Reform Church Dominee, Swanepoel who
also started pulling out his intestines about Apartheid and apologised
on behalf of the entire church without any mandate from anyone of the
congregation. Ds Swanepoel se derm uitrygery oor Apartheid So when
such "leaders" tell us how wrong we were, then we tend to
believe them. But let us look at the truth. Anyone who knows the
history of South Africa will know that nobody suffered more on the
soil of South Africa, no one has bled as much as the Afrikaners and
their descendants the Boers. The Whites of South Africa and
specifically the Afrikaners have nothing to be sorry for. In fact the
Blacks owe them a tremendous gratitude and a gigantic apology for the
way they treated Whites in the last 350 years.
Afrikaners have a song that is taught to all Afrikaans kids from the
crib and that every Afrikaner today knows. The name of this song is
called, "Siembamba". The lyrics are so heavy that I almost
do not want to repeat it here. But it goes like this, "Siembamba,
mama se kindjie, Siembamba, mama se kindjie --draai sy nek om, gooi
hom in die sloot; trap op sy kop dan is hy dood." For our
international readers I will freely translate and then explain. "Siembamba,
mommies little child, Siembamba, mommies little child, --Wring his
neck, throw him in the ditch, Step on his head, then he is dead
Believe it or not
this is a song Afrikaans people sing to their
children while rocking them to sleep! It records the brutality of the
Xhosas who would indiscriminately kill white women and white babies
during the nine Kaffir wars.
Black men are mostly cowards
who are only brave when in packs. They actually seldom engage in head
on confrontation with White men. When they attack it is always in
groups, while people are asleep. Their preferred targets are the
elderly, women and children. A common myth amongst foreigners and
South Africans alike is that they think that before the White man came
to Africa, Blacks lived in peace and harmony with nature and with each
other. This harmony with nature is not entirely wrong. It is the
perception of "In harmony with nature" that is
People want to believe that nature is pure
and good and that the lion lies with the lamb, but reality is far
removed from that. When one sees how hyenas tear a live animal apart,
how a praying mantis bites the head off her mate after copulation how
the Streptococcus bacteria can destroy human flesh, one is left with a
feeling that nature can be very cruel. Nature amongst African blacks
have always been very cruel. Blacks who supposedly lived in tune with
nature were regularly eaten by lions, crocodiles, bitten by snakes,
stung by scorpions and their numbers controlled by insects like the
mosquito (Malaria) or the Tsetse fly(sleeping sickness). Yellow fever
and Cholera were other forms of nature to control the numbers of
Blacks... But it has to be said that before the white people came to
Africa, the most effective way Blacks controlled their own populations
were with genocidal tribal wars...and cannibalism. Let me point out
some of the psyche of the Blacks in order to try and understand his
petty jealousy and envy.
Amongst the Black communities it is
not allowed for individuals to show ingenuity or individualistic
prosperity. The moment one Black person starts to rise a little above
the others, he will be the first one to be hammered down by the
community like a nail in a wooden floor. Those who do prosper are
ostracised by their black tribes and it will be said of them that they
are not real blacks that they are whites with a black skin... That
mentality still persists to this day, but this petty envy is
accompanied with an inbred, inextinguishable, brutality that the
whites of Africa came face to face with and learned about the hard
Ever since the white man set foot on South African
soil, he has been shocked and horrified at the brutality of the
blacks. No matter how much the whites wanted to believe in the "equality
of man", they were sadly confronted only with the brutality and
reality of Stone Age savages. Blacks of central Africa sold other
blacks they have conquered into slavery to Arabs, other black tribes
and also to whites.
The moment one tribe had a bit more than
the others, they would be prone to a nocturnal raid by neighbouring
tribes who would kill all the men, rape the women and children, steal
the cattle and incorporate the women and children into their own
tribes. Tribes who were not strong enough would flee the area. In sub
Saharan Africa it meant that nobody wanted to flee north, because they
knew it was a desert where they could not survive. So the only way was
to flee south. The weakest of the weakest tribes were right in the
front, followed by a slightly stronger tribe, followed by ever
increasing stronger tribes further north, driving the weaker ones
south. Roundabout the same time that whites first settled in South
Africa, black tribes first entered South Africa. They were
contemporary settlers of the area now known as South Africa. In some
areas whites were the first and in others, blacks were the first.
Blacks moving South and Whites moving north looking for better grazing
for their cattle eventually met at the Fish and the Kei rivers around
1770...About 120 years after the Whites first (permanently) settled at
the Cape of Good Hope in 1652 . To put it into perspective, it was
about the same time as New York was founded in the USA. Who were these
Blacks they met at the Fish River? They were the Xhosa.
Xhosa were fleeing from the Zulus who murdered them en masse. Even
until today the word or name "Xhosa" in Zulu is synonymous
with the word "coward". The animosity between the Xhosas and
the Zulus goes back hundreds of years. Mandela and Mbeki, the two
previous presidents were both Xhosas, but the current president, Jacob
Zuma is a Zulu. Zulus and Xhosas hate each other more than they hate
whites and that says a lot. But why do the other Blacks of South
Africa hate the Zulus? It goes back to "King" Shaka. Note I
put "King" in inverted commas.
Blacks can never be
kings of any kind...before one can be a King, one should first be a
MAN. Shaka was a sadistic psychopath who committed genocide on a
larger scale than Rwanda has ever seen. The Zulus wiped out entire
tribes, entire cultures in what is today known as the Mfecane or
Dfecane (Annihilation). Shaka's terror was so great that Mzilikazi,
the chief of the Matabeles fled BACK NORTH...direction where Zimbabwe
is today. Amongst all this chaos arrived the White man in the region
of the Xhosas. They fought nine "Wars" against the Xhosa
between 1811 and 1879. The Frontier Wars, Kaffir wars or Xhosa wars
Everytime the wars were about Xhosas stealing cattle and other
livestock, burning down homesteads, killing not only white farmer
families in the most horrific torturing ways, but also the coloureds
who worked for the whites. It was at the time of the sixth Kaffir war
that Piet Retief decided to trek with the other Voortrekkers.
Piet Retief and his party thought they could negotiate and buy land
from the Zulus, but they were massacred on a hill at the kraal of the
Zulu King, Dingaan when they respected the wishes of Dingaan to leave
their weapons outside. Every man and boy, around 100 in total, were
clubbed to death. Retief was the last to be killed, so as to witness
the death of his comrades. Dingaan then ordered all Voortrekker
laagers to be attacked along the Bushman's River. An orgy of violence
started. Families were camped at Bloukrans, Dorinkop, Moordspruit,
etc. Cowardly blacks would attack them during the middle of the night,
killing everyone in the most horrific ways. Women were brutally gang
raped and pregnant women were cut open, their babies killed in front
of them while they still lived. Small children and babies were picked
up by their feet and their heads smashed against the sides of the
wagons. Among the Voortrekkers , 41 men, 56 women and 185 children
were killed. In addition another 250 or 252 Khoikhoi and Basuto that
accompanied the Voortrekkers were killed. A girl called Johanna van
der Merwe (12 years old at the time) sustained 21 assegai wounds, but
managed to survive. The Voortrekkers built the town Weenen (meaning
wailing) at the site.
The Bloukrans Massacre Throughout the
following decades up until the present day the whites of South have
experienced this petty envy and brutality at the hands of blacks.
Examples are legion. Boers retaliated at Makapansgat where blacks
savagely murdered whites in the most horrific ways. Hermanus Potgeter
was tied down to a rock bed and skinned alive like an animal while
still conscious, he died while the blacks ripped his organs out. More
lately we saw the brutal black on black murders with the necklace
method . We saw blacks storming into white churches with AK 47's and
hand grenades, opening fire on the unarmed congregation such as at the
St James Church massacre. We have seen everything from brutal Muti
murders to the evil torture preceding the brutal killings of White
farmers and their family members in Rhodesia, Namibia and also in
South Africa, most of the time nothing stolen. More than 3000 White
farmers and family members murdered to date since the ANC took over in
It is necessary to reiterate that this violent nature
of blacks are not directed at whites only, so the black behaviour
apologetics who claim that this behaviour is retribution for wrongs
committed by whites against blacks, have no leg to stand on, because
most often than not this black violent nature is directed at their own
kind as we have seen with Shaka's defecane, Muti murders and
necklacing. No, this brutality, this murderous, stealing and other
asocial behaviour of Blacks could never and can never be reconciled
with the behaviour of the deeply religious and pious Boers of South
Africa. This violent behaviour of blacks was one of the rationales for
Apartheid. The other was cultural differences. More on that in the
next edition. For now it is important to realise that whites in South
Africa never wanted to rule blacks. Whites wanted to separate from
blacks and stay as far away from blacks as possible.
Pandora's Apartheid Box - Part 4 - Black culture and customs. Second
Rationale for Apartheid
I find it rather amusing that the
cultural relativists wants to tell us that all cultures are equal and
that no culture is better or higher than another, but these same
primitive cultures they want to make equal to our White Western
culture, rejects the notion of equality outright. In South Africa we
observe this amongst blacks on a daily basis. Again the examples are
legion, but let us start with the way the African black treats his
women. I said women (plural), because Black men are polygamous. They
can marry as many women as they can afford.
When a black man
walks down the street, his wife is lucky if he allows her to walk five
paces behind him. Most of the time he tells her to go walk on the
other side of the street and a few paces behind him. You see this all
the time in South Africa, but we who grew up in South Africa just
accept it as "it is just the way blacks are". Although black
women can vote in official government elections, on a tribal level
they have no political say and are not allowed to even sit amongst men
least raise an opinion. I said that a black can have as many wives as
he can afford. That does not mean that he has to work and look after
his wives. Quite the contrary. Traditionally the women do all the work
in black culture.
Black men buy their women and pays for
them in cows in a system known as "Lobola". It starts with
five cows and then the two families barter a price. The price is
dependent on her social status, whether she is still a virgin or
already has a child, what education she has, etc. The daughter of a
chief is worth around twenty cows, but normally the price is kept down
to between five and ten cows for ordinary women. Once married the
woman is chattel and becomes the possession of the man, to breed and
beat as he feels fit. The Xhosas practice what is called, uKetwala
(the hunting down of a young girl and raping her to make her his wife)
Missionaries from Europe have tried to convert the Blacks to
Christianity ever since the whites first set foot on African soil.
These missionaries came across savages who believed in the powers of
their dead ancestors, rather than that of a deity. Just about all
civilisations had deities of some sort, but it was absent amongst
blacks in South Africa. Believing in an almighty God and abstract
thoughts such as time infinity takes intelligence that blacks lack.
These missionaries saw the results of intonjane (female initiation)
and ukwaluka (boy's circumcision and initiation into manhood) where
some boys were lucky to live after their penises fell off due to
gangrene, etc. They saw the licentious behaviour and customs of the
blacks, but none of their efforts could ever win the blacks over. They
struck up compromises in the hope to later convert the blacks, but
even after their best attempts the best they achieved was that blacks
accepted Christianity as an addition to their tribal religions and
beliefs, not as a replacement. Blacks continue to practice their
traditional beliefs in parallel with Christianity up until this very
Read about the fruitless experiences of the
missionaries here The bible says in Mathew 7 verse 6: "Give not
that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before
swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and
rend you." In Mathew 13, Jesus said to plant the seeds on fertile
soil only, because the rest will only produce thorns and weeds.
let us explore the weed and thorn infested soil of African customs. To
us whites the initiation rites of blacks are horrific and barbaric
practices that are still practiced to this very day. No Xhosa will
ever be accepted as a man if he as a last resort to save his life,
went to a western hospital during the circumcision period. The Zulus
initiation into manhood is called ukeshwama. A group of boys have to
kill a bull with their bare hands. They pull out his tongue, stuff
dirt down his throat, squeeze his testicles till it burst and then
finally wring his neck by gripping the horns until his neck snaps.
They also have to tear meat from the carcass with their bare hands and
eat it raw. This is all in the name of "Culture".
the most horrific practice amongst blacks in South Africa and Africa
in general has to be "Muti-murders". One just has to make an
internet search or a search on a news site like IOL for "Muti-murders"
to be shaken to the core at the brutality of the black man. Muti means
"medicine". It is made from plants or animal organs, but the
most powerful muti is made from human body parts, harvested while the
person is still alive. Everything from sexual organs to hands, lips,
ears and other organs are cut from victims of all ages while they are
still alive, including young children and babies. Some will say that
these are a few dissident Sangomas (traditional healers) who practice
"muti-murders", but the shear amount of these killings tells
us that there are huge markets of believers amongst the black
communities which drive these killings.
believe in the "Tokoloshe", a hairy goblin-like creature
with a huge penis, who is sent by the Sangoma to attack them if they
have done something wrong. One can literally write volumes on the evil
practices and beliefs of black South Africans. In more modern times
new "cultural beliefs" of blacks have emerged that shows
their primitive mindset that no amount of education or conversion to
Christianity has been able to change. Blacks believe that sex with a
virgin will cure AIDS. This has resulted in horrific rapes of babies
as young as six months. Black men rape lesbians, to "correct"
them. It is called by the media, "corrective rapes".
can any cultural relativist ever be able to convince us that these
practices, customs and cultures are the same as ours? The problem is
that people who do not know Africa, or more specific, South Africa,
will never believe anything I wrote above, yet it is all true and only
a fraction of the truth about the blacks of South Africa. The
information is today freely available on the internet and in books.
Cultural relativists should first go and try to preach their "equality"
and "relativism" to the blacks of Africa, before they try to
convince others of it. The whites of South Africa learned the hard way
from observing the black man in his natural habitat over hundreds of
years since they first settled on South African soil in 1652.
all this evil, never, not once, did it cross the minds of the Whites
to annihilate and obliterate the entire black populations of South
Africa, although they had every reason to do so. The whites were too
pious and despite all the evils committed against them during the nine
Kaffir wars, at Bloukrans, at Bloodriver, at Makapansgat, etc, still
believed in "Peaceful co-existence" with Blacks. The whites
acknowledged the nature of Blacks, with all their evil customs,
cultures and superstitious beliefs. The whites did not want to change
any of it like the missionaries attempted (and failed) to do. No, they
just wanted to separate themselves from such evil as far as possible.
In the end the piousness of whites would mean their downfall. What
they should have done was to extinguish this evil.
Pandora's Apartheid Box - Part 5 - Black cognitive ability. Third
Rationale for Apartheid.
Long before studies like "The
Bell Curve" or "Race and Reason" were published, before
IQ tests were invented, we whites of Africa knew the mind of the black
Nobody had to prove anything to us. We knew
the limitations of the African black and his capacity to break
whatever he touches. We knew his strengths and his weaknesses. From
simple, obvious and uncomplicated examples the white man drew his
conclusions about black's cognitive abilities. The white man noticed
that the blacks from South Africa never invented the wheel. Blacks
never had any written languages. They had no dug-out canoes, let alone
ships. Their dwellings were nothing but single roomed shelters that
resembled poor imitations of inverted bird's nests, made from sticks
and grass. They had no woven cloth and were wearing animal skins. They
had no maps and no borders. They had a primitive belief system and
their tribal laws were held and changed by "elders" at will
after drinking their tribal beer/brew. They were nomadic cattle
herders that never permanently settled in one place for too long. They
hardly grew crops and if so, it were small patches of subsistence
maize introduced by the whites who brought it back from South America,
the only place where it grew and existed.
Yes that is right.
Maize, which is today the staple food of all Blacks throughout the
entire Africa, comes from South America and was introduced to blacks
by white European settlers. Blacks today cannot even imagine a life
without maize, yet they say that whites never brought anything good to
Africa. As I said before, blacks needs to go down on their knees and
thank the Lord for sending the white man to their evil continent.
Because as far as providing for themselves...they are useless. Blacks
have proven that they cannot farm. They hardly understand the
principle of irrigation, let alone ever building any dams. When a
slight drought occurs one year all their crops fail and they starve.
Whites in South Africa developed commercial farming into a science and
built universities such asElsenburg at Stellenbosh ...blacks who have
worked on white farms for their entire lives, for generations, never
learned a thing and every white commercial farm that was handed over
to blacks failed, even after vast amounts of money was thrown at them,
training was given and the most modern implements bought for them by
This tragedy is documented in a book by Dr.
Phillip du Toit called, The Great South African Land Scandal . Dr du
Toit has made his book available online, free of charge. Liberals and
cultural relativists will be quick to point out that there are many
blacks today who are academics, medical doctors or lawyers. They will
tell us that the environment determines IQ. They somehow believe that
a black child raised in a white household, who went to white schools
and who had all the opportunities as a white kid would magically
become equal or better than a white child. It is only the simpleminded
who believes this. Eskimos live on the same parallel as Northern
European Whites, but have never been able to reach the same level of
development and ingenuity as Whites from Scandinavia, Russia or
Germany. Blacks who live in Tropical conditions have never been able
to build the structures of the Incas, the Mayas or even anything
resembling the beauty of Angkor Wat in Cambodia. Besides, the
Australians tried it. They took Aborigine children away from their
communities, raised them in wealthy white households, sending them to
only the best schools, etc. The results were that these Abbo children
reverted to the same behaviour and sometimes worse than that of their
traditional communities. Today we refer to them as The stolen
So what about those clever blacks you ask?...The
ones who are doctors, etc...? Anybody who has ever taught blacks
anything, lectured to them or tried to jerk them into the twentieth
century will understand what I am about to say?
I have to
tell you a little story here. When I was at school in South Africa I
had a friend. Let us call him "Manie". Manie was a hyper
intelligent young boy. At the age of eleven when we had the "Rubik
Cube" craze, he was solving the puzzle in 50 odd seconds. Later
on in high school, Manie produced straight A's, he could play several
musical instruments including the drums, guitar and trumpet. He played
Rugby and was also a martial artist of note. Manie became a dentist
and is currently practicing in the UK. While he was a medical student
I once asked him how difficult the course was. He said to me that to
become a doctor is not difficult. It is a SHIT load of work to study,
but it is not difficult as in Engineering or Physics. I asked him why
he opted for Dentist. He told me that when he wants to drive a Porche,
he wants to go out there and buy him one. He was honest. He did not
become a dentist, because he had some calling in life...he did it
purely for the money. So for blacks to become medical doctors is
actually not that difficult.
The black (Zulu) historian and
Shaman, Credo Mutwa talks about this in his book, "My People"
(1969). Credo says that blacks never had any written language so they
have no written history. Their history is passed down orally from
Sangoma to Sangoma. See, the Sangoma is not only the traditional
healer, he is also the preserver of the oral history, the tribal laws
and the ancient rituals and customs of the blacks. He explains that
blacks have an excellent memory that they drill from childhood through
stories, rhymes and songs. To remember detail they use what we would
call "memory association". For instance, Credo Mutwa says
that the blacks have a huge respect for the late president of the ZAR,
Paul Kruger. President Kruger had an ability to mimic the sounds of
all birds through whistling. Even till this day the township of
Mamelodi east of Pretoria, capital city of the ZAR and South Africa is
named after Paul Kruger, the whistler. His statue stands on Church
Square in Pretoria.
When one teaches blacks, it is not
uncommon to find that they score well to very well in tests or exams
where they have to repeat what they were taught. In fact it is almost
well known amongst educators that blacks are better at this than
whites. But when it comes to applying knowledge...when it comes to
using logic, faultfinding and problem solving skills, blacks fall by
the wayside. They just cannot do it. A black can pass all the theory
exams to become a pilot, but put him in a simulator and subject him to
crisis situations where he has to think rapidly, then one sees the
cogs of the black cognitive system start flying all over the place.
And I am talking about the one percent...the best of the best,. The
other 99% are only good to dig ditches, provided they do not break the
pick or spade. The proof is in the pudding. It is not as if the world
is over run by Nobel Laureates for hard sciences like physics or
chemistry. How many black astro or nuclear physicists do you know?
Today much is being said about Black education under
Apartheid, but the truth is that in 1987 at the height of Apartheid,
six million black children were at school, a new record for South
Africa at the time. In the previous year 1800 classrooms for secondary
education were built by whites, with white money for blacks. About 130
new schools were built. If one considers the schools burnt down by
blacks at the same time the education standards of blacks could have
been even higher. At the time black South Africans had the highest
literacy rate amongst other blacks on the entire continent. Blacks had
eight universities in South Africa producing lawyers, doctors,
teachers, etc of world standard. None of those people would say today
that their education and degrees are of an inferior standard. Quite
the contrary, they are extremely proud of their education they
underwent during Apartheid. Telling them that their education was "Sub
standard" would be insulting them.
As I have mentioned
before, South Africa was a world leader in medical science during
Apartheid and established a unique Medical university called MEDUNSA
which produced amongst others on average 200 black doctors per year.
MEDUNSA also trained nurses and other medical staff. The most amazing
thing is that no matter how well Blacks are educated, they never let
go of their superstitious believes in the Tokoloshe, Muti witchcraft
and ancestor worship. Blacks who hold high positions today such as
ministers in parliament or judges...blacks who are engineers, still
consult the witchdoctor on a regular basis. Blacks still run around
and attack everyone, including their own with pangas. No amount of
western education will ever be sufficient to change the African black
savage into respectable human beings. They are what they are. We have
to be honest with ourselves and with blacks and accept them them for
who and what they are. We have to realise that our cultures will never
be compatible. Just as the Boers never wanted to rule over the Blacks,
the Boers will NEVER accept blacks ruling over them.
previous National Party government was not stupid. They never took any
decisions without thoroughly investigating all options. They studied
the Swiss Canton system and the Belgium model with the Flemish and
Walonians ...No sytem could be compared to the unique South African
situation. Apartheid was not the only option. There were others to
consider like the Stalinist option of just exterminating all
opposition in their millions. But BJ Voster asked us to accept the
reforms, because the other options were just too ghastly to comprehend
for the pious Whites of South Africa.
Apartheid Box - Part 6 - Other rationales for Apartheid
far I have only scratched the surface and told the reader about the
more common practices and customs of Blacks that whites know about and
find abominable such as, Lobola (buying wives with cows), the
initiation rituals of boys and girls, witchcraft, superstition,
muti-murders, raping babies to cure AIDS, etc. There are so many more
rationales for Apartheid that one can actually write a book about
them. And indeed someone has written a book about it...several books
actually. His name is Credo Mutwa and the name of the book is "My
People-The writings of a Zulu witch-doctor". (1969) ISBN
014003210X The book is extremely rare and few people know about it. It
is not even mentioned on the Wikipedia page of Credo Mutwa. It is a
fascinating book, giving you insight into the various traditions of
black South Africans of various tribes, their beliefs, their
superstitions, their customs and their mindset. Credo is the most
respected Sangoma and Sunusi in the whole of South Africa. He is a
traditional healer, a black historian and an authority on traditional
customs and beliefs of the black tribes of Africa. If one has to
compare him to Christianity, then Credo Mutwa would be the pope of
traditional healers. He mentions several practices that is just too
ghastly for the pious whites of South Africa to accept.
of the things he describes is the Black law of infanticide when twins
are born. This practice is still carried on today. Think about
it...look around you...how many black twins have you seen in South
Africa? "The law requires that if a woman gives birth to twins,
one must be destroyed by having a round pebble pushed down its throat.
But in the case of triplets, one must die and two must live" "My
People", Chapter 10, Pg. 218 So the few "twins" we see
amongst blacks were actually triplets of which one was killed.
also killed their own wounded soldiers "The wound would fester
and sooner or later the patient would die. Even small gaping wounds
spelt a write-off of the patient; large mPanga slashes were regarded
as fatal at the outset and warriors thus wounded were given a mercy
death. Many battle axes were furnished with special 'dispatchers' for
this purpose." "My people" Chapter 11, pg. 234. I will
conclude with a topic that very few people wish to address and prefer
to ignore...But if we are going to be honest about blacks and why we
had Apartheid, then we need to mention the facts that blacks are
untidy and...well they smell funny.
One just has to look at
how blacks live. From ancient times until today, it does not matter
where in the world one goes, a black area looks like a pig sty. I have
seen this in Trinidad and Tobago, in Haiti, in Jamaica in the Bahamas
and everywhere I went in Africa. I have seen this from black areas in
European cities to ghettos in the USA. Blacks just cannot keep their
environment clean and tidy. Everything is disorderly, chaotic and
dirty...Rubbish lying all over the place.
that one sees in townships of South Africa, is that Blacks do not
plant grass, flowers or trees amongst their tin shacks. This is
amazingly odd. Firstly, because blacks work as gardeners or
bricklayers for whites. So the ability to build is there, the ability
to keep lawn and a garden is there. Why is it that blacks never do in
their own areas what they do when they are working for whites? Maybe
their environments are reflections of how they keep their bodies
orderly and tidy as well.
This is how blacks are. They are
actors. They can even mimic a White accent, white behaviour or
intelligence and appear almost the same as whites. Many whites fall
for this and indeed believe that blacks are the same as whites...but
it is when one gets to know blacks up close and personal that one sees
through this veil and behind the mask. Blacks can bullshit a lot,
especially when they work for whites. Then they know they have to put
their best foot forward or lose the job. That is when they wash, dress
respectably and behave almost white. In the workplace, blacks who are
utterly incompetent will fake competence, bullshit their way through
every day, steal other's work...all an act to hide their incompetence
and when they are caught out, they just change jobs and repeat the
That is when one realises that the so called
intelligent words coming out of the mouths or pens of Martin Luther
King or Barack Obama are all stolen. All non original thought and
written by speech writers or whispered in their ears by advisors. But
something blacks find extremely difficult to hide is their body odour.
Blacks smell. Everyone knows this. You go to Poland, you go to Japan
and you ask anybody about blacks, you will hear they say, "Blacks
smell". Maybe there is a biological reason for it, but I am not
exactly keen on finding out. All I know is what my nose tells me and
that is that Blacks smell really bad and that I cannot live with that.
But let me quote what Credo Mutwa says in his book, "My
people", (1969) chapter ten. "Xhosa women also prepare
mysterious potions to secure their husbands to them, so that they will
not be forsaken. This potion is prepared as follows: The woman
refrains from taking a bath for several days, and then rubs the body
dirt off her skin in little rolls. To this she adds the hair she has
shaved off her private parts. Then follows ground Bangalala root
which, when mixed with milk, is a violent aphrodisiac. The recipe may
also include the powdered dry petals of a sunflower, a little spittle,
and a piece of sandlewood. The whole concoction is then heated in a
bowl until red hot and thus reduced to ashes. These ashes are then
stirred into the milk of a nanny goat which had a deformed kid, until
a thick putty is formed. This is then rolled into little balls or
pills, which are added one at a time to the husband's food." "My
People", Chapter ten, pg. 213.
It is clear that the
religions, cultures, customs and the behaviour of blacks are just too
different than that of white, Christian people. These cultures are
worlds apart and totally incompatible with each other.
and blacks will never get along in South Africa. Anybody who believes
such a pipe dream as a multicultural "Rainbow Nation", does
not know black culture or white culture. Such a person would only be
fooling himself through masturbating his own delusional, liberal,
feel-good mindset. No, I am sorry to disappoint such people, but
blacks and whites are NOT the same. The reality of South Africa is so
that few options actually exists. Either one of the two, black or
white, totally wipes out the other or they separate completely. Not
partial separation as under Apartheid...Total separation. The reasons
for Apartheid are still as valid today as they were 100 years or 50
years ago. Whites can never apologise for Apartheid, because whites
cannot help for the inferior cultures, customs and behaviour of
blacks. Separation and separate development of all the tribes is and
was the most humane and fairest solution for all the complex groups of
Opening Pandora's Apartheid Box - Part 7 - The
role of a government
When one asks most people, white or
black, what the role of government is one will get various opinions
depending on who one pose the question to, but in general most people
believe that the role of government is to develop and maintain
infrastructure, in other words build dams, roads, schools, etc. Their
means of doing this (it is believed) is to tax the citizens. Most
people also believe that the government (politicians and civil
servants) steal some of this money out of the state coffers...and that
is what we call corruption. They further believe that some governments
steal more than others. Some build more schools and roads than others
and a good government is the one who does not steal and who builds
lots of "things" such as sport stadiums. But in reality it
basically works like this...
Several political parties
compete to rule the country to represent the people. The party that
has the best sales pitch, that appears to be the most just will win,
voted in by the majority population. Once in power the self-enrichment
starts. The politicians do not care one bit about the people who have
voted for them. Their sales pitches, lies, empty promises, bullshit
and fraud is all just to get to the feeding trough and pocket the
spoils, but open theft will soon end them into prison so they have to
be sly about it. All governments spend more than they raise in taxes.
Government officials borrow money from gigantic banks and other
financial institutions to finance their building of roads, houses for
the poor, etc. They then contract the jobs to companies that they
themselves own, their families own, etc. This borrowed money ends up
in the pockets of the politicians, but the loans needs to be paid
back. This is where our taxes come in. Our taxes pay back to the banks
what our governments have stolen. The more liberal/socialist the
government, the bigger the government structure will be and the bigger
the theft, nepotism and corruption will be. Conservative and
nationalist governments tends to be smaller and the corruption a lot
The more uneducated the people of a country is, the
least they will grasp this thieving principle and the fewer checks and
balances will be kept on their thieving government. That is why
liberal/socialist governments will introduce dumbed down education
systems such as Outcomes Based Education and Training (OBET) to keep
the people uneducated. In fact everything from sports to radio,
newspapers and television will be changed to keep people ignorant of
the theft going on behind the scenes. It is important to reiterate
that theft and corruption happens in ALL governments to some extent.
Some of them are mild when it comes to corruption, but most are
aggressively greedy. The longer they stay in power, the longer they
are in the front row of the feeding trough. That is why a socialist
government like the ANC in South Africa has one goal and that is to
stay in power for ever. Or as Jacob Zuma said, The ANC will rule until
Jesus comes back
In order for us to understand the reasoning
and rationale behind Apartheid it is necessary to briefly look at the
role of Government. We as human beings want to live and survive. We
want to pass on our genes into the future and in this short period of
being here on earth, we want to be happy. Part of being happy is to
have a house, furniture, a television, or whatever makes us
happy...basically to own property. This is called the right to life
and the pursuit of happiness through the ownership of property.
comes in when someone wants to take your life away, take your property
away or interfere in anyway with your pursuit of happiness. Such a
person is then initiating force. He is stealing from us, physically
attacking us, defrauding us, etc and therefore threatening our
survival and our pursuit of happiness which are the most fundamental
rights an individual can have. When you are a strong burly bloke, you
can easily defend yourself against such a person and your retaliatory
force will be just. You did not initiate the force, but protected your
right to life and happiness. But what if the assailant has weapons, or
there are more than one? What if you are a child, a frail woman, an
elderly person or mentally handicapped? How do you then protect
yourself against the initiation of force? And that dear people is why
we have a government.
The ONLY job of any government is to
protect our individual rights. The role of any government is to
protect our right to life and our pursuit of happiness from those who
wants to take it away from us. The way government does it is to have
an army to protect us from those outside of our country who are or
might be attacking us and threaten our survival and pursuit of
happiness and to have a police force to protect us from those inside
our country who wants to take our individual rights away. The
government therefore needs to uphold the laws that the citizens feel
are rightful and just to protect them from the initiation of force and
what threatens their individual rights...First as a warning to those
intending on taking away those individual rights and also to punish
those who break these laws. One thing a government should never do is
to initiate force against its citizens. This becomes a dicey topic,
because extorting taxes is a form of initiation of force. A government
can actually totally fund all its expenditures through other moral
means such as setting up trust funds with all the money and property
it owns, donations and people paying for services such as passports,
toll roads, vehicle registration, etc. Companies who want to transport
their goods through harbours, by rail or road, etc should pay for
using this infrastructure. Taxes therefore become obsolete. There is
not a single government department that cannot FULLY pay for itself.
Nevertheless, I am digressing. The National Party government
in 1948 were faced with all these dilemmas when they came to power.
Their primary task as a government was to protect ALL the citizens of
South Africa. In the previous instalments of this series I tried to
explain the background to this dilemma, considering the vast diversity
of South Africa's people, their cultures, their religions, their
languages and their histories. I explained how Blacks from literally
hundreds of smaller tribes were fighting against each other for
hundreds of years before the whites came to South Africa, often wiping
each other out completely. Credo Mutwa writes in his book "My
People" (1969), chapter eleven, page 244:
the High Laws of the Bantu is the law of revenge...The result of this
law is that there are blood-feuds going on all over Africa which show
no sign of dying out. Some of these have already been going on for
generations. The Zulus have been feuding with the Basutus (Sothos),
and also with the Shanganes of Portuguese East Africa (Mozambique),
for more than a century. The feud between the Baluba and some of its
neighbouring tribes has been going on for nearly six hundred years,
while the feud between the Masai and the Wakambi in Kenya has now
entered its tenth century. The Bahutu (Hutus) and the Wa-Tu-Tutsi
(Tutsis) have been at each other's throats for as long, and as
recently as 1963 the newspapers reported that this senseless feud had
accounted for another 30,000 Wa-Tu-Tutsi lives". Note how Credo
Mutwa writes about the animosity between the Hutus and the Tutsis of
Rwanda in 1969, referring to a relatively small massacre of 30,000
Tutsis in 1963. It culminated in full blown genocide of between
800,000 and 1,2 million Tutsis in 1994.
This is exactly the
chaos Apartheid tried to prevent. The South African situation was
unique. It was a major challenge and it had to be solved fairly. The
NP had to find a compromise that everyone could live with and be happy
with. The White NP government intimately knew the blacks of South
Africa and the blacks of Africa in general. They knew about Shaka's
Defecane that was worse than the Rwanda genocide, they knew about all
the inter cultural and inter tribal differences of the blacks of South
Africa. They knew about the massacres of whites during the Xhosa wars,
the massacre of whites at Bloukrans, the Battle of Blood River and
The only way to keep the peace, protect all
the citizens of South Africa and to secure the individual rights of
all the people of South Africa was to separate them, let them develop
at their own pace, give them autonomy the right to rule themselves,
draw up their own laws and enforce those laws with their own armies
and police forces...The official government policy was called..."Seperate
Development"...The Media called it, "Apartheid".
Proposed in 1973 accepted and enforced in 1976The United Nations
General Assembly declared Apartheid a crime against humanity without
offering an alternative to South Africa's situation.
question is thus open. Considering the background that I have sketched
so far in this series...what would you have done if you were in charge
of South Africa at the time, faced with the same challenges? What
would your solution have been? The worst that Apartheid critics can
dig up...the worst "Massacre" they can ever refer to...is
the Sharpeville shootings in 1960 when 69 blacks died.
that to Rwanda 1994... Rwanda is exactly what Apartheid tried to
prevent. It does not matter what people says about Apartheid
today...on the watch of the National Party, no Rwanda style massacre
ever occurred on South African soil. More than 3000 white farmers were
not killed by black savages under Apartheid, reported rapes of 50,000
per year never happened under Apartheid.
Contrary to what
most blacks and/or liberal whites would like to think about what
whites supposedly did to blacks under Apartheid. There are no mass
graves, there is not a single concentration camp, and there are
certainly no gas chambers where whites tried to exterminate blacks.
Quite the contrary. White South Africans built the biggest hospital in
the world, Baragwanath (today called the Chris Hani Barragwanath
hospital) for blacks with white expertise and white taxpayer's
money... 3200 beds and 6760 staff members. For that, and many other
altruistic and charitable endeavours, whites of South Africa were and
still are made out as the evil skunks of the world.
Pandora's Apartheid Box - Part 8 - The lies about the Homelands
A common myth or lie about Apartheid is that the whites stole the land
from the blacks and shoved them on 13% of the land of South Africa in
what was called Homelands. It is further believed that blacks barely
scratched out a living in these homelands due to it being on barren
soil or arid regions. It is further claimed that whites made sure
there were no minerals on these lands before giving to the blacks. It
is time to address these lies. Traditionally South Africa belongs to
the whites who first permanently settled South Africa since 1652.
Blacks entered South Africa at about the same time, but never
permanently settled any area, because they were nomadic cattle and
goat herders. Blacks only started settling areas permanently after
Wherever the Boers or Voortrekkers went they
bargained for land with local Blacks who settled certain areas before
them. In fact there is hardly any part of South Africa that was
conquered by whites from blacks. Piet Retief's treaty with the Zulu
King, Dingaan still exist to this day. Blacks settled other areas than
the whites and in those areas blacks have the right or claim on those
It is however difficult to determine their claims,
because blacks had no written language, no maps and no legislation
such as land title deeds. Despite this, whites researched the areas
that Blacks traditionally settled and gave them full autonomy to rule
themselves, with their own police forces and armies trained in South
Africa with white taxpayer money.
To create work, white
business people were encouraged to open factories in these countries
with huge tax concessions. The ten homelands were as follows: Transkei
-Xhosa Ciskei - Xhosa Venda - Venda Bophuthatswana - Tswana Gazankulu
- Tsonga/Shangaan KaNgwane - Swazi KwaNdebele - Ndebele KwaZulu - Zulu
Lebowa - Pedi (Northern Sotho) QwaQwa - Sotho Note how some blacks got
TWO or even THREE countries of their own. The Xhosas got both Ciskei
and Transkei. The Tswanas who have their own country called Botswana,
also got Bophuthatswana. The Sothos who already had Lesotho as their
own country also got Lebowa and QwaQwa. The Swazis who already had
their own country Swaziland got KaNgwane. After South Africa became a
union in 1910, the territories (British protectorates) of Bechuanaland
(Botswana), Basutuland (Lesotho) and Swaziland was excluded from the
union, but the plan was to incorporate them later.
successive South African governments always tried to enclude them, but
the British played delay tactics and after South Africa withdrew from
the commonwealth in 1961 it ended any prospect of incorporation of
these territories into South Africa. Botswana got its independence
from Britain in 1966, Lesotho in 1966 and Swaziland in 1968. If one
considers that these countries are actually part of the original South
Africa, then the territories under Black rule and autonomy including
the other homelands makes up 50% of the total land and not 13%. One
further has to remember that about 70% of the current South Africa is
uninhabitable simply because it is too mountainous or it is half
desert in the Western part.
Only about 10% is under normal
climate conditions economically viable farmland. When one considers
the rainfall map of South Africa and the areas settled by Blacks, then
one sees that Blacks settled in above average rainfall areas. The soil
of these homelands was some of the most fertile soil of South Africa.
Today the black ANC government is taking white owned farms away and
handing them over to blacks to be totally ruined in a few months.
Something else a lot of people do not know is that the White NP
government ALSO forced whites off their land by paying them out
undervalued sums for their farms so that they could hand it over to
blacks in the establishment of the homelands.
know people who lost their successful dairy farm in those days to make
way for the Ciskei. About 48% of all the viable agricultural land was
in these Black homelands. Today the Blacks want to say that these
lands are barren. As I have mentioned it is totally false, but on the
other hand, these were the areas the blacks chose out for themselves
to settle on about 200 years ago. The cannot blame the whites for it
It is often said that whites first made sure that
there were no minerals in these homelands before they gave it to the
Blacks. This is also false. In the homeland of Bophuhatswana, the
Tswana homeland in addition to having their own country Botswana, we
can find the largest Platinum deposits in the entire subcontinent.
Gold are also mined as a byproduct in these platinum mines.
the "Book Verrat an Südafrika" Klaus Vaque mentions an
article in the German Magazine "Deutschland-Magazin" Nr.
3/83 where a Lebowa chief was asked if it was true that blacks have
been pushed onto worthless desolate areas... I freely translate, the
chief answered: "No, it is not true. We have here all the raw
materials except diamonds and crude oil. We have all other minerals.
As far as agriculture is concerned, we have some of the richest parts
of South Africa. We have good rainfall and good soil. I think our
livestock are some of the best and our wheat and maize potential is
fairly high. The people who say that we have been pushed onto dry and
desolate areas do not know what they are talking about. I think they
are talking about others."
The question has to be
asked...what is so bad about giving all the major Black tribes of
South Africa their own country where they could rule themselves on
territory they historically settled and where they could be ethnically
homogenous, where they could speak their own language, practice their
own culture and religion and where they could be totally free? What is
the crime in that?
Opening Pandora's Apartheid Box - Part 9
- The lies about the Townships
It is today not un-common to
find White people who lived through Apartheid in South Africa who have
never set foot in a black or coloured township. Most whites never lost
anything in a township and never saw the need to go to there. Besides
it was dangerous, and the further they could stay away from blacks the
People commute from Somerset-West, Strand or
Gordon's Bay along the N2 highway to Cape Town for years every day,
but they never ever turns off into the townships south of Cape Town
International Airport (D.F. Malan Airport) to have a look. All they
see are the slums of Cross-Roads, Langa and Nyanga and it scares them
away... Most whites do not even know the coloured township of
Mitchel's Plain. They do not know the bad areas such as Tafelsig,
Lentegeur or the posh areas such as Woodlands or Strandfontein. If
they could see the millionaires houses of Athlone, they would fall on
their backs. The image that most whites of South Africa have about a
township is what they have seen on television, in papers or magazines.
I myself was about 19 years old and a conscript when I first set foot
in Gugulethu, Cape Town. I can remember how surprised I was at how
good the houses looked in certain parts...all the sports facilities
and other amenities were not what I have seen on TV. We were only
shown the worst parts...the Squatter Camps.
word "Township" is today confused with the word "Squatter
Camp", but we are not allowed to use the un-PC term of "Squatter
Camp" anymore, it is now called, "Informal Settlements"...
Nevertheless, a black township in South Africa has different sections
just like any other town around the world. It has rich areas where
educated blacks and black businessmen live in millionaires villas, it
has the middle class areas and it has...well the squatter camps. The
problem is that the media always only show us the poor, squatter camp
areas. Whites of South Africa and the world are kept ignorant by the
We are not allowed to see that there are literally
millions of extremely well-off blacks in South Africa who live in
fairly good areas, on par with whites or well-off coloureds. The lies
about the townships are numerous, but the most common one is that
blacks were forced to live there under extreme poverty conditions and
were denied the same amenities as whites had. Well, in the previous
section of this series I pointed out that all the black tribes were
given their own countries to live in where they traditionally settled.
Nobody forced them to come to white cities. But blacks
streamed in their thousand towards the white cities and set up
squatter camps around the outskirts of these white areas, because they
knew that whites were giving them work, but also, because they knew
whites were very charitable and always gave them free clothes, food,
etc. This is quite ironic, because on the one hand the whites are
painted as evil racists and blacks selectively believe this when they
want to, but when blacks are truly honest with themselves, they will
realise that whites always gave them lots of stuff...for free.
has always been like that in South Africa and will probably be like
that for a long time to come, because South African whites are
compassionate, charitable and good people. Nevertheless when these
squatter camps became too large and/or a health risk due to the
unhygienic practices of blacks, whites would build them proper houses
with proper sewage systems, health clinics, schools, churches, roads
with electric illumination, sports facilities and many more. This is
how the townships came about. Basically built by white taxpayer
money... Now I know there will be some people not convinced that these
townships were actually quite well kitted out.
So let us
take an example...let us take the most well known township of South
Africa, called Soweto, but the same can be said of just about any
black township in South Africa. At the hight of Apartheid in 1978
Soweto had 115 Football fields, 3 Rugby fields, 4 athletic tracks, 11
Cricket fields, 2 Golf courses, 47 Tennis courts, 7 swimming pools
built to Olympic standards, 5 Bowling alleys, 81 Netball fields, 39
children play parks, and countless civic halls, movie houses and
clubhouses. In addition to this, Soweto had 300 churches, 365 schools,
2 Technical Colleges, 8 clinics, 63 child day care centres, 11 Post
Offices, and its own fruit and vegetable market. There were 2300
registered companies that belonged to black businessmen, about 1000
private taxi companies. 3% of the 50,000 vehicle owners in 1978 were
Mercedes Benz owners. Soweto alone had more cars, taxis, schools,
churches and sport facilities than most independent countries in
The Blacks of South Africa had more private vehicles
than the entire white population of the USSR at the time. Today Soweto
has modern shopping malls like, Dobsonville Shopping Centre. In 2005
the Protea Gardens Mall opened. This was followed by the Baramall
Shopping Centre and the Jabulani Shopping complex and the Maponya
Mall. Experts say that Soweto has as much as 25% oversupply of retail
space. The Canadian Medical Doctor, Dr Kenneth Walker wrote about
Soweto, (I freely translate from "Verrat an Südafrika",
Klaus Vaque, 1987,pg 41) "In Soweto I saw many homes that costs
about $100,000 (1978) and that had a BMW in the driveway. All houses
are single storey. Many are recently painted. Many had flowerpots in
the windows and lawn in the front. Only 2% were shacks.
had the choice to live in Soweto or in the apartment dwellings or "Projects"
of New York, Chicago, or Detroit where there is so much crime, then I
would not hesitate for one moment and choose Soweto." The biggest
hospital in the world, Baragwanath with 3200 beds and at its peak
almost 8000 staff had 23 operation theatres fitted out with the most
modern medical equipment that existed in the world. Blacks were
treated here, operated on...at full state costs to the white-taxpayers
for unlimited periods. The budget of this hospital was and is higher
than the yearly budget of most small member states of the United
Next door to Baragwanath is the St. John's Eye
Clinic. The clinic is world famous for the treatment of Glaucoma,
Cataracts, traumatic eye injuries and rare tropical diseases. All
built and maintained by white taxpayer's money. Baragwanath in 1978
employed 450 medical doctors in full-time service. It treated 112 000
in-patients and 1.62 million out-patients per year. The children and
infant death rate with 34.8 per 1000 was lower than Harlem in New
York. In 1982 alone, this hospital performed 898 heart operations of
world quality. Ironically...90% of the blood donors for this hospital
were whites, who donated blood free of charge, totally
voluntarily...to save black lives. (Quoted from The Citizen, 2 April
In my time at school and as a student, the Red Cross
or St Johns Ambulance would come to our white schools, universities,
colleges and even our workplaces to solicit for blood donations. All
we got was a cup of tea and some biscuits. Regular blood donors would
get a lapel pin and would wear it proudly at work or university.
the blacks want the whites to apologise for "the evils" of
Apartheid. They want compensation. They have been compensated R30,000
each after the TRC , but it is not enough... they want more, they want
blood...but we have already given them our blood. We already saved
millions of black lives with our blood donations during Apartheid. How
do you put a price on our blood that we donated? How do you put a
price on black lives saved by white blood? As you can see dear reader,
the blacks of South Africa are eternally indebted to us whites...not
the other way around. We owe them nothing, they owe us... big time.
Pandora's Apartheid Box - Part 10 - District Six, A case study in
When one today thinks about Apartheid forced
removals, immediately Sophia Town in Johannesburg (blacks) and
District Six in Cape Town (coloureds) springs to mind. We will take
District Six as a case study. Today one is up against a mind set of
people who wants to believe that District Six was a Multicultural
paradise where, mostly coloureds, some Indians, some whites and also a
few blacks all lived in harmony and perpetual bliss.
believe that the evil white government destroyed a happy go lucky
community and forced them onto the Cape Flats, mainly where Mitchels
Plain is today. To tell the truth about District Six today will be a
Firstly a bit of history... Where is or
was District Six?...Well if you stand with your two legs in the water
of Table Bay and you look towards Table Mountain, District Six would
be on your left side at the slope of Table Mountain, just above "The
Castle". Today the Cape University of Technology (Zonnebloem
campus) stands on part of the area. The origins of District Six is
like this. Many moons ago during the Dutch and later British rule, it
uses to be a farm called Zonnebloem.
After the abolishment
of slavery throughout the British Empire (1833) coloured people
started squatting on the outskirts of Cape Town against the foot of
Table Mountain, because they still wanted to work for the whites, but
when they were slaves they were housed by whites, but as free people
they now had to find their own houses. Two areas of freed slaves
developed in Cape Town in what is called, "The Bo-Kaap" and "District
Six". The Bo-Kaap was mainly a higher classed Muslim area and
District Six, although also having a lot of Muslims, was made up from
other coloureds of lower social standing.
Now it has to be
remembered that the Cape Colony only introduced official building
regulations in 1861. By that time, 28 years of indiscriminate building
by coloureds, resulted in a slum area developing in Cape Town's
District Six that was getting worse with every day passing. There was
no proper sewage or running water infrastructure in those days.
no time, District Six became an overcrowded slum, with narrow
alleyways between jumbled together structures. Here one has to
consider that building rules are largely there for safety and health
reasons. Windows need to be of a certain size to allow fresh air and
natural light in. Rooms need to be a certain height...Every human
being needs a certain amount of breathing space to prevent diseases
such as Typhoid, Tuberculosis, etc from breaking out (as is the case
in overcrowded concentration camps). Streets need to be a certain
width so that ambulances and fire trucks can reach emergency
The coloured people from District Six knew
nothing of such "trivialities". They just kept on adding
more structures made from wood and corrugated iron sheets. This
phenomenon can still be observed when one visit coloured areas today.
No sooner have they received a house from the government for free, or
they start building a "hok" (shack) in the backyard. Some
have even multiple shacks or what is called "Wendy Houses",
low quality wooden dwellings. These shacks and Wendy Houses are rented
out and provide the owner with an income.
Some even set up
shebeens (illegal, informal drinking bars) in their backyard. In the
case of District Six it was exactly like that. Some of these people
had several such shack dwellings that they would rent out and became
what is referred to as the "Slumlords" of District Six. Most
houses were small, some consisting of only one room housing as many as
20 people. The toilet was in the back yard and washing comprised turns
in the bath tub in the kitchen or washing oneself in a "kom",
a plastic bowl filled with some hot water. Once a week was enough.
Further, In District Six started what is today referred to as the "Skolly
gangs"...coloured hooligans, who preferred a life of crime,
drinking and drugs over honest hard work. By the 1930's District Six
was a rat infested hellhole full of shebeens, "smokkelhuise"
(smuggling houses) and brothels, where, alcohol and drugs flowed
freely and sparked more and more social ills.
realised that something had to be done about District Six before an
epidemic of bubonic plague or cholera could break out that would have
killed thousands. The government knew the history of the three
smallpox epidemics of 1713, 1755 and 1767. The smallpox epidemic of
1713 killed about 90% of the KhoiKhoi (Hottentots) and about 25% of
the whites of Cape Town. The University of Cape Town has all the
archives in their library. It is called THE DENIS VERSCHOYLE PAPERS
Denis Verschoyle, an Irish immigrant, was a City Engineer and Town
Planner in Cape Town. From 1961 to 1972, he lectured on the history of
town planning in the School of Architecture and Planning at the
University of Cape Town. He died in 1997. The information is today
freely available to anyone who wants to know the truth about Cape Town
planning and in particular, District Six. Basically Mr. W.S.Lunn who
was city engineer in the 1930's had a plan. He wanted to transform
District Six. He wanted to build proper houses with proper
infrastructure and so, started building houses... by the beginning of
the Second World War, a total of 1127 homes had been built. But the
coloureds did not want to move into the new houses. They claimed the
rent was too high, but the rent was actually subsidised by the
government (i.e.) White taxpayer money and very affordable.
a coloured culture for you. They always seem to have money for drugs
and alcohol, but never for rent or utilities. Why pay rent and
electricity when you can live for free in a shack and burn candles and
have more money for alcohol? Eventually some did move into these
houses, but as usual the backyards started being filled with illegally
erected structures. Today the coloureds that lived in District Six
have very fond memories of a period when alcohol flowed freely, Dagga
was smoked and every second person could play a musical instrument.
Their memories of District Six are basically...party every night...I
do not dispute that they were very happy there.
Like I said,
in reality the place was a nest of social ills, it was dirty and it
was a health risk...a ticking time bomb in actual fact. But how does
one convince a pig that wallowing around in shit all day is bad for
him, when he is so happy at doing it? When one takes the pig away from
his shit puddle, washes him off and let him live in a clean orderly
place, he will be most distraught and upset with you. He will forever
have fond memories of his shit puddle, where he was happy. No amount
of explaining will ever convince him of anything else.
how did these memories of such a harmless and convivial District Six
take root in the minds of coloureds over the years? Basically the
newspaper called "The Cape Times", in an attempt to save
District Six, ran some articles in the 1950's focussing on the music
and culture of the people, painting everything rosy and saying nothing
about the social ills, the gangs, the brothels, the alcohol and drug
abuse...or the rats. In 1966 the National Party declared District Six
to be a 'White Group Area' so enabling them to destroy all buildings,
except religious ones, on the grounds of 'slum clearance'.
government moved about 60,000 people from District Six to the Cape
Flats at a cost of 30 million Rand including compensation. In 1970,
the government renamed the area Zonnebloem after the original Dutch
farm. They offered the land to investors to rebuild it, but no
investors showed interest to rebuild the area, so the Government built
the Cape Technikon Zonnebloem campus there.
In District Six,
there is a museum today that documents this period in an extremely
biased and subjective way. It says that about 60,000 coloureds were
forcibly removed from District Six to the Cape Flats because of the
colour of their skin. It fails to mention that the coloureds of the
Bo-Kaap are still living there and so are the ones from Observatory.
If the government wanted to remove the coloureds from District Six,
because of the colour of their skin or to take their "prime"
land, why did they not also move the Bo-Kaap coloureds? The Bo-Kaap is
situated in the centre of Cape Town on prime property and worth
Why did the government not build millionaires
villas in District Six, but instead chose to build a learning
institution? The simple truth is that District Six was everything from
an eyesore, to a filthy slum, to a gang and rat infested hellhole. The
government in those days employed highly qualified health inspectors.
One of them who were involved with the destruction of District Six
told me how they went in there, saw rats the size of cats and millions
of cockroaches half a foot long...how they had to board up these
building structures first, fumigate them before they could destroy
them, because they feared the plague would spread to the rest of Cape
Today the ex residents of "District Six" are
a dime a dozen. Although only 60,000 were moved today the "survivors"
are probably double that if not more. The "victim mentality"
has fully taken hold of these "ex residents of District Six",
but what they forget is about 40,000 whites were also forcibly removed
from their land to make place for the Black Homelands. These whites
have never been properly compensated for losing their farms that they
had to sell way below market value to the government at the time, but
they simply got on with life and made a living somewhere else.
Six was a case study in this issue, but the same can be said for
places like Sophia Town where Blacks were also removed. Large
concentrations of people from whatever race, who overcrowd and
indiscriminately build with no planning, will always, pose a health
risk not only to themselves, but also to their neighbouring
Today they complain about forcibly being
removed, but what was the alternative... Death by epidemic
They should be thankful that they are still
alive today to yarn swap about their times in District Six, because if
they carried on the way they did, disease would have wiped them out
for sure. The irony is that they cannot see the truth. They see the NP
government as a bunch of racists who wanted to exterminate them, but
if that was the goal of the NP, they could simply have done nothing
and waited for the bomb of disease to explode. No, the NP did
everything in their power to avoid it. They actually saved thousands
of coloured lives and entire future generations, along with their
music and culture in District Six with their removal to the Cape
Flats. Today it is easy to reminisce about the banjo playing, alcohol
and dagga clouded times of District Six, but when you are a
professional government with a job to do...to protect all your
citizens...the picture is rather different.
Pandora's Apartheid Box - Part 11- Bantu Education under Apartheid
Communists value and care so much about education, why do they kill
off the educated elite as the first thing they do in taking over a
country? From Stalin's purges to Mao's "Great leap forward",
From Cuba to Cambodia...the first thing the Communists do when they
take over is to kill the academics and educated elite...IN THEIR
In Cambodia they killed about 2 million alone.
People were killed for simply wearing glasses, because if you could
read, you were already too clever. That alone should convince anyone
that communists have never and will never give a toss about education.
In fact the worst enemy of the communist is the educated person. The
entire system of communism is depended on a dumbed down, uneducated
and unemployed proletariat (the sheep). Today the Bantu-Education Act
of 1953 is highly criticized, called "racist" and "discriminatory".
I wonder how many of those critics have ever read it
through, because I have and I still challenge anyone to point me to
the discriminatory part. Yet it is today held up as one of the main
reasons for the resistance against Apartheid as well as the violence
of the student's uprisings of 1976. Its critics are the usual gang of
liberals, culture relativists, humanists and racial egalitarians, but
their criticism holds no water. If one scrutinises the Act as posted
above, one will see that the act established a black education
department, basically gives the minister of education along with the
minister of finance the right to fund the black government schools in
a way they deem appropriate, that the government holds the right to
determine the medium of instruction and that the minister of education
can consult and establish black school councils on how to run the
schools and what to teach. There is absolutely nothing wrong with
As I said in part Seven of this series, the duty of
the government was not and is not and will never be to provide schools
(or any other infrastructure) to anybody. The role of the government
is to protect the citizens against the initiation of force. That is
it! For the rest of the part, they should keep their nose out of the
business of the people. Government schools are actually a form of
initiating force. It steals our money, it locks our children up with
criminals, gangsters and drug dealers every day, it teaches them
socialist doctrines, dumb them down incapable of rational or logical
thought, and it falsifies our history. ..But people like schools,
because they think schools do good.
Nevertheless the NP
government taxed whites almost to death to provide schools for blacks.
During Apartheid schooling was made compulsory for all children up to
16 years of age... But apart from the actual Bantu Education Act of
1953, that nobody ever reads, and just believe what they find in
Wikipedia about Apartheid Education...How did it actually work? As I
have pointed out during this series, whites and blacks have huge
cultural differences between them. Whites and blacks have huge
religious and language differences between them. Would it not be fair
that blacks be instructed in a way that is more suited towards their
cultural and religious needs? If one takes the road of the racial
egalitarian and culture relativist, one would destroy the culture of
the lacks, destroy their language and religion.
Relativism destroys all cultures. Racial egalitarianism destroys all
races, humanism destroys all religions. Remember that the previous
government was called the "National Party" not, "The
National Socialist Party". It did not believe in the destruction
of other cultures and people, it believed in the peaceful co-existence
between diverse groups, their preservation and separate, but equal
And that is all Bantu Education was. It
acknowledged the cultural and religious differences of whites and
blacks and seeked to educate both groups along those cultural lines.
Surely it would be wrong to force the stories of Snow White and
Goldilocks down the throats of black children. How do they relate to
Repunsel with here long hair when blacks have peppercorns or afros?
It would be far better if they learned their own songs,
their own culture and their own stories of how the zebra got its
stripes when God did not intend for black and white to even exist. The
same with white children. It would be far better to teach them about
their own poems, songs and books. Blacks and whites have different
heroes, different values, different everything.
to be educated in a different way than whites. Blacks have a natural,
affinity to music, dance and colourful art. Should one have destroyed
that and forced them subjects that they do not like, do not understand
or should one have taken their natural talents and improve on it? When
someone says that the Bantu Education system was inferior to that of
the whites, then that person either admits that black culture is
inferior or that whites are superior. They will then have to explain
what they mean by inferior. Inferior to what? Relative to
what?...Maybe High Western civilised education?
If they say
that educating blacks along black cultural lines is inferior to
educating whites along white cultural lines then I have to ask
you...Who are the real racists here...liberals or Nationalists? There
were thousands of blacks during the time of the National Party who
made it to university and for those provisions of tertiary education
of world standard was provided. Ten black universities in SA and the
homelands in total. Today one just has to look around to see how many
medical doctors, nurses, lawyers and judges there are in South Africa
who got their education under this exact "Bantu Education"
system of the National Party. It was not inferior at all. If one
accuses any of these graduates of having a substandard degree or
education, one would be insulting such a person. One has to remember
that blacks In South Africa had no schools, no written language no
basic arithmetic, nothing... prior to the white man came to Africa and
through their missionaries started educating blacks.
societies placed strong emphasis on traditional forms of education
well before the arrival of Europeans. Education involved oral
histories of the group, tales of heroism and treachery, and practice
in the skills necessary for survival in a changing bush environment.
The European styled English and Afrikaans/Dutch curriculum placed no
value on such skills. It would have been morally wrong to force such a
European system on the blacks of South Africa.
are many who wants to quote and say that the NP wanted to purposefully
keep blacks stupidand who selectively quotes what suits them , but
when one look deeper and see the truth behind the bullshit and the
proof of the pudding then the picture is rather different.
an article called "Die Afrikaner" 11 Feb 1987, the quarterly
magazine called "Vox Africana Nr 29 4/87 stated that, South
Africa had 4,8 million whites and 18,2 million blacks in 1987. The
whites paid 77% of the taxes and the blacks only 15%...despite
this...56% of the government budget was spent on blacks. Today it is
often quoted that, "Per-capita government spending on black
education slipped to one-tenth of spending on whites in the 1970s".
What everyone fails to say is that... Since 1970 the budget for black
education was raised by about 30% per year every year. More than any
other government department. In the period 1955 -1984 the amount of
black school students increased 31 times from 35,000 to 1,096 000. 65%
of black South African children were at school compared to Egypt 64%,
Nigeria 57%, Ghana52%, Tanzania50% and Ethiopia 29%. Amongst the
adults of South Africa, 71% could read and write (80% between the ages
12 and 22). Compare this to Kenya 47%, Egypt 38%, Nigeria 34% and
Mozambique at 26%.
In South Africa, the whites built 15 new
classrooms for blacks every working day, every year. At 40 children
per class it meant space for an additional 600 black students every
day!!! In 1985 there were 42,000 Blacks at 5 universities in South
Africa, about the same amount at the universities of the homelands.
Another example of "Bantu Education is the unique medical
university of MEDUNSA that I mentioned in Part 5 of this series. Here
the whites trained black medical doctors, dentists, veterinary
surgeons and paramedical personnel to world class standards...at full
state costs. About 200 black medical doctors were qualified here every
year...thanks to the "oppressive" Bantu Education system.
Source: (Verrat an Südafrika, 1987, Klaus Vaque).
search to find the true reasons for the 1976 Soweto School riots, I
found that most sources say that the riots was because of AFRIKAANS
being forced to be taken as the medium of instruction. Why this
vilification of Afrikaans? The truth is that if one looks at the
original decree one will see that both English and Afrikaans would be
used on a 50-50 basis.
Once again we see how Afrikaans has
been vilified over the years. I can still understand to a degree why
the blacks would object to Afrikaans or English, but what I cannot
understand is why the coloureds of Cape Town, who only spoke Afrikaans
or English, would also boycott and riot. Here is the original
Northern Transvaal Region "Regional Circular
Bantu Education" Northern Transvaal (No. 4) File 6.8.3. of
17.10.1974 To: Circuit Inspectors Principals of Schools: With Std V
classes and Secondary Schools Medium of Instruction Std V - Form V 1.
It has been decided that for the sake of uniformity English and
Afrikaans will be used as media of instruction in our schools on a
50-50 basis as follows: 2. Std V, Form I and II 2.1. English medium:
General Science, Practical Subjects (Homecraft-Needlework-Wood- and
Metalwork-Art-Agricultural Science) 2.2 Afrikaans medium: Mathematics,
Arithmatic, Social Studies 2.3 Mother Tongue: Religion Instruction,
Music, Physical Culture The prescribed medium for these subject must
be used as from January 1975. In 1976 the secondary schools will
continue using the same medium for these subjects. 3. Forms III, IV
and V All schools which have not as yet done so should introduce the
50-50 basis as from the beginning of 1975. The same medium must be
used for the subjects related to those mentioned in paragraph 2 and
for their alternatives. ... Your co-operation in this matter will be
appreciated. (Sgd.) J.G. Erasmus Regional Director of Bantu Education
N. Transvaal Region
One has to remember that the National
Party government always insisted on "Mother Tongue Education"
for ALL races during the primary school period. It was official
government policy. Further note how Afrikaans and English would only
be used for Mathematics, Science and technically skilled subjects. The
rest would still be mother tongue. But why would they want to
introduce Afrikaans and English in these black schools to instruct
subjects like mathematics, science and metalwork?
problem is that blacks simply never had any words for objects they
never knew; they borrowed Afrikaans and English words to describe
technical things. The word for Scissors is "Iskêra"
from Afrikaans (skêr). The word for knife is "Imêsi"
from the Afrikaans word (mes), etc. Can you imagine trying to explain
the replication of a DNA molecule to a black student in Xhoza? Can you
imagine explaining the parts of a lathe to black students studying
metalwork or woodwork? If you are going to use 90% English words, you
might just as well do the entire thing in English...or Afrikaans for
that matter. A lathe is a dangerous piece of equipment...people can
The other reason I found that blacks
objected to was the maximum age of school attendance. Whites would
finish school at 18 or 19. Blacks on the other hand would be 18 years
old in grade 7 or 25 years old in matric (Grd 12). They also started
later at the age of 8 or 10. Then they expected the whites to just
keep on paying for this. Then they cannot understand why less money
was spent on them than on whites every year. Not only were they 5
times more than whites, they flunked so much that they spent an
average of an extra five years at school.
The irony of it
all is that the Indian journalist Prega Govender wrote an article in
the Sunday Times of 22 October 2006, telling how black students at
school were taking English as their first language at school, dropping
their own mother tongue as second language and replacing it with
Afrikaans, which they found easier. These students either dropped
their own mother tongue completely or relegated it to "Third
Language status" Prega Govender,
Easy-Afrikaans-chosen-over-African-languages Now I ask you, "What
were all those riots in 1976 for?" The whites of South Africa
made a big mistake.
They should never have introduced "Bantu
Education" to the blacks. They should never have taught the
blacks anything. It was not their responsibility to educate blacks. If
blacks are so good, then they should educate their own people. They
should build their own schools, universities, and colleges with their
own money, their own initiatives and their own know-how. They should
go for it...I wish them nothing, but luck.
For our efforts
to educate the blacks out of stone age and into the modern era, we
were vilified and stoned, even killed by. We were cursed at, spat at
and blamed for everything else.
The alternative we see today
is the socialist "Outcomes Based Education and Traning"
system, where "nobody fails", "Everyone passes"..."Pass
one;Pass all" is the ridiculous slogans and demands nowadays.
Little black boy in a group with whites and coloureds dragging their
marks down and raising his own merely through his presence...but
hey... they all pass, right? What is the problem? The school system is
a timebomb...Four Natal schools with 0% matric pass rate "Liberation
before education" was the slogan during the Eighties.
the communists succeeded in their goal? Have they dumbed down the
blacks and most whites? A few pockets of free thinkers remained who
are today blowing the horns. People are waking up from their liberal
and socialist sleep. The ANC keeps singing their lullaby, but
everywhere the horns are blowing and more and more people are waking
up...The ANC knows their days are numbered. Bantu Education made them
clever enough to realise that.
Opening Pandora's Apartheid
Box - Part 12- The Architects of Apartheid
Today when one
asks, "Who was the Architect of Apartheid" one would almost
unanimously get the answer of "Dr. H.F. Verwoerd". It is
today taught in schools and all over the internet as "fact"...
The saying goes that when you want to beat a dog, it is easy to find a
Today the Afrikaners, the decedents of the Boers, are
bearing the brunt of this accusation as ""The Creators, and
or the Monsters of Apartheid". Now some Afrikaners would proudly
accept that title as the inventors of a system of segregation called
Apartheid and as I have said, they might even try to patent this
model, but do they actually have a claim to it? When one does the
proper research one will find that the segregation policies that
eventually became known as "Apartheid" was actually not
started by the Boers/Afrikaners but by the British High Commissioner
Lord Alfred Milner between the end of the Second Anglo Boer War and
unification of South Africa in 1910.
Milner started a group
called his "Kindergarten" made up of civil servants close to
him. Why, you ask? In those days and especially in 1905 the subject of
"The Native" question and the "Asian menace" first
came up when the Cambridge Anthropologist, Alfred Haddon, addressed a
meeting between the "British Association for the Advancement of
Science" and The South African Associations. (Source, A
Commonwealth of Knowledge, Science, Sensibility, and White South
Africa 1820-2000, Saul Dubow) Sir Godfrey Langdon, author of "The
South African Native Affairs Commission report", urged Howard Pim
to outline an overall scheme of racial segregation. The official
report from those days is called, "Report of the 75th Meeting of
the British Association for the Advancement of Science 1905 (London,
Lord Milner was an arch racist who had some
serious dualistic problems. He described himself as a "Race
Patriot" in a letter to Haldane, 21Jan. 1901, "Very
Confidential", in Headlam(ed.), Milner Papers, ii.206. Milner had
no time for the Boers and many times tried to slight them on their
characteristics - for example he said that the Boers can continue to
fight a guerrilla war for a while, "just as low types of animal
organisms will long survive injuries which would kill organisms of a
higher type outright..." (M van Wyk Smit, Telling the Boer War")
Milner could not synchronise his hatred for the Boers, their "Backwardness"
as he described it, with the countless defeats of the British and the
superiority of the Boers on the battlefield.
In those days
the post Anglo Boer war British Government of South Africa were hoping
to erase differences between Boers/Afrikaners and the English speaking
South Africans. They thought it would be only a matter of time before
these two groups would fully merge. The "Selbourne Memorandum"
of 1907 opens and speaks of these two principal races of South Africa
- British and Dutch - to overcome their historical differences. The
memorandum declared that both groups were "Teutonic in origin"
and that the fusion between them would only be a matter of time as it
was with the Saxons and the Normans who were distantly related.
Selbourne memorandum said that there were more differences between the
people of Ireland or Canada than there were between the Boers and the
British of South Africa. Basically, the idea before the Unification of
South Africa in 1910 was to unite the two white tribes and separate
them from the blacks.
Two of Milner's "Kindergarten"
group, Lionel Curtis and Patrick Duncan confided in each other, "The
fact is that we have all been moving steadily from the Cape idea of
mixing up white, brown and black and developing the different grades
of colour strictly on the lines of European civilisation, to the very
opposite conception of encouraging as far as possible the black man to
separate from the white and to develop a civilisation, as he is
beginning to do in Basutoland, on his own lines." (Patrick Duncan
Papers BC294C23.3.8, University of Cape Town, Manuscripts and
Archives, Curtis to Duncan, 26 Nov 1907).
The term applied
to this British strategy was called "Segregation". The
Afrikaans word for it would be "Apartheid"
be seen so far, the idea of Apartheid came from various sources. The
Whites of South Africa, whether it be Boer or Brit had an intimate
knowledge of the Blacks of South Africa. It was basically a common
consensus that Whites and Blacks have to be separated.
ALL ...black and white...wanted Apartheid.
This can be seen
from the aspirations of the Sothos and the Swazis who wanted their own
kingdoms where they could preserve their own culture, language,
religion and where they could rule themselves. The Tswanas who got
Botswana is another example. Therefore we are all guilty of the so
called "Crime of Apartheid". There is absolutely nothing
wrong with any nation who wishes to secure and preserve their way of
life. There is nothing wrong with any nation wishing to live in
peaceful harmony with their neighbours.
Apartheid or Separate and Equal Development was a unique concept,
wished by all South Africans, both Black and White. Nobody has to feel
guilty about it today. It was OUR country and we had to find a
solution where we could all be happy with and live with each other.
Today the critics of Apartheid are numerous, yet nobody have produced
a better model for the unique South African situation. The current "Rainbow
Nation" model has proved to be an abject failure.
need for people to rule themselves and have a national identity is the
most natural system on earth. It is called Nationalism.
have seen this need amongst the Basks and the Catalonians of Spain,
the Croatians, Serbs, Montenegros, etc of Yugoslavia, The Irish and
the Scots of the UK, The Kurds of Syria and Turkey, The Ibos of
Nigeria, The Hutus and Tsutsis of Rwanda, the Muslims in Chad, The
Tamils in Sri Lanka, The Greeks and Turks in Cyprus, The Walonians and
the Flemish in Belgium.... This need to be separate is a worldwide
Maybe Apartheid was not perfect, but show me a
political system that is. In South Africa we came upon a system that
kept the peace and where we lived happily alongside with each other
until the Communist agitators entered and disturbed our peace, where
they played us off against each other after we have already fought all
our battles and made peace with each other. We found our own solution.
We found our own peace that was called "Apartheid",
but the communist wanted the riches of our country and made us enemies
again. South Africa will forever be a unique situation and only
us...The Blacks and Whites of South Africa will be able to find a
solution we can all live with in the end. The solution for our
problems will come from us who have shared this beautiful country for
hundreds of years, not from outsiders who just want our gold and
Let me finish with a quote.... "You do not
want any reforms; You want my country" (President Paul Kruger to
Lord Alfred Milner - 31st May, 1899, shortly before the outbreak of
the second Anglo Boer war)
Opening Pandora's Apartheid Box -
Part 14 - Scapegoating Apartheid to steal our country and our wealth
are several reasons why South Africa had to be given over to the ANC
Marxist terrorists; Apartheid was not one of them. Compared to human
rights abuses in Islamic and Communist countries, Apartheid was
actually mild. By 1987 just about all the Apartheid laws were
abolished, but the world still kept sanctions and boycotts against
South Africa. It becomes clear that the "Struggle against
Apartheid" was nothing more than a deception by international
power players to get their hands on the treasure chest of the world,
namely South Africa.
There were mainly three reasons to
conquer South Africa by any and all means. 1) South Africa is the
richest country in the world when one considers the mineral wealth
beneath its soil 2) South Africa was a Christian and Nationalist state
and therefore a rock in the way of globalists. 3) The strategic sea
route around the Cape of Good Hope was in the hands of these
South Africa's wealth Just before the outbreak
of the Second Anglo Boer war, "Human rights abuses" was used
as a stick by British imperialist to get their hands on the wealth of
the Boers. This excuse would be repeated again fifty years later in
1948 to vilify and demonize the whites of South Africa and more
specifically the Afrikaners as the creators of the evil system of "Apartheid".
This term was created by the media. The official policy of the
government was "Separate and equal development".
the previous chapter, I showed clearly that the Afrikaners were NOT
the architects of Apartheid neither where they the only ones who
practiced it, yet countries with far worse human rights records
hypocritically installed a full spectrum of sanctions against South
Africa. Whenever I think about the demise of South Africa, I think
about lions and hyenas fighting over the carcass of a dead Springbok.
Once they have eaten themselves full, they leave the rest for the
vultures (the ANC) to pick off.
But why would the entire
world gang up against four million whites at the Southern tip of
Africa? The reason is that South Africa possesses the mineral wealth
that can make it a superpower in the world. In the 21st century the
mineral wealth of South Africa will surpass the oil wealth of the
entire Arabic region. Many of these minerals are critical to the
Western weapons industry. Therefore the Soviet Union wanted their
hands on these minerals so that they could first of all have control
over all the mineral wealth in the world, and secondly so that they
could deny the West these strategic minerals and in doing so win the
The West could not let this happen. They could not
let the Communist control the mineral wealth of South Africa and in
doing so cut off the jugular vein of the Western world and at the same
time control the strategic sea route around the Cape of Good Hope. If
the Communists were allowed to control South Africa they could form a
mineral cartel similar to that of the OPEC oil cartel and could close
the tap on the West whenever they felt like it. South Africa possesses
93% of the world's Manganese, 83% of the Platinum, 61% of the world's
Vanadium, 63% of the Gold, 29% of all the diamonds, amongst many
The Communists knew that whoever controlled the
strategic Cape sea route also controlled a jugular vein of the Western
economy. About a quarter of the West's oil comes around the Cape. On
average 70 ships round the Cape of Good Hope every day. That is about
25,000 ships a year with a Brutto Registered Tonnage (BRT) of 550
million tons. (Welt am Sontag, special edition May/June 1986). By now
the reader is probably asking himself why the West would have
sanctions against a pro-western, anti-communist country such as South
Africa. Not only would they cut off their own jugular, but also that
of neighbouring Southern African countries that depended on the
harbours of South Africa for their exports of ore.
really believable that the West would risk suicide because of a system
such as Apartheid? Why would the West support a Marxist terrorist
organisation such as the ANC, whose goal always was to make South
Africa a member of the Communist world? The answer to this we will
only find when we see the onslaught against South Africa in a
holistic, global strategic way in which the West and the East had
In his book, "The War on Gold", Dr.
Anthony Sutton writes that the reasons for the onslaught against South
Africa had very little to do with human rights issues or the internal
politics of South Africa. That was all just propaganda for the war on
Gold. Dr. Sutton adds that Henry Kissinger, who left the prosecution
of political dissidents in the USSR untouched, would also not be
touched by the welfare and concern about voting rights for blacks in
South Africa. Professor Sutton adds that the war on gold was
orchestrated from Wall Street who also financed the Bolshevik
These diabolical International financiers want a
"New World Order", a one world government of "Dollar
Imperialism" under Wall Street control under which the USSR would
only be a technical and economic colony of the United Nations. (See "Wall
Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, Dr. Anthony Sutton). The
independence and sovereignty of any nation is a stumbling block in the
way of people who wants a one world government with a single currency,
a world police force and a world army.
The UN delegate Andrew
Young, after a visit to Windhoek, Namibia told journalists that a
Communist Angola or Namibia would not bother the USA in the least,
because such countries would always be an easy market for goods from
the USA. The payment would always be in the form of mineral
concessions that the enslaved nations would be required to work for.
Today the colonisation of Africa is made out to be the
enslavement of blacks, but this is simply nonsense. The colonisation
of Africa meant advancement for blacks. A better living standard,
education and peace like they never experienced before. It is the
Decolonisation of Africa that means slavery to these blacks. Never
before in history has blacks been so much exploited and enslaved as
after decolonisation. None of the colonial powers such as France,
Belgium, England, Portugal or even the Whites of South Africa have
ever exploited the blacks of Africa as much as the High Financiers are
doing today. These Third World countries are de facto the property of
high finance groups who make their currencies into worthless paper and
any loans in US dollars have to be paid back in the form of mineral
This neo-colonisation of Africa by Wall Street
is thus hitting two birds with one stone. Firstly they get their paws
on the mineral wealth of the country and secondly the country
sacrifices its independence and sovereignty in the march to a one
world government. A strong, independent sovereign and White South
Africa that possessed the largest Gold reserves in the world and, next
to the USSR the largest reserves of strategic minerals, therefore
became a gigantic rock in the way of these global financers and their
planned Socialist World Government. A corrupt black, Communist
government is much easier manipulated than a professional and strong
incorruptible white government. Neither the Western financers nor the
Communists ever give anything away for free.
All the weapons
and money the ANC received from the Communists and the West needs to
be repaid now. Further the ANC takes on massive projects such as
building of (low quality) houses for blacks, acquiring weapons such as
frigates, submarines and fighter jets from Europe to a country that is
not at war and at peace with all its neighbours. Soccer stadiums are
built that will become white elephants in no time. They set up
Socialist schemes such as the "All-pay" system of paying
grants to unproductive and lazy blacks that breed more unproductive
and lazy blacks. They give out contracts for new types of driver's
licenses, passports, etc
All of these government schemes are
contracted out to companies owned by the top brass of the ANC and
needs to be financed from somewhere.
The Western financiers
are only too glad to grant them loans of billions of dollars that ends
up straight in the pockets of ANC fat cats such as Tokyo Sexwale and
Patrice Motsepe. At the end of the day this money needs to be paid
by the white taxpayer, the enslaved milk cow of the ANC. It
is therefore in the interest of the ANC to prevent the whites of South
Africa to find out the true extent of the theft and rape of the
country that is currently being perpetrated under their noses. It is
in the interest of the ANC to paint a rosy picture of a rainbow nation
and dumbing whites down into believing all is well in South Africa,
because they cannot afford all the whites to leave the country as more
than a million of the four million whites have already done. But the
Global Financiers are not really bothered about how many whites leave
South Africa. In fact the sooner they leave the better, because the
moment the milk cow runs away, the sooner the ANC will have nothing to
repay the financiers and the sooner they will start pawning off the
mineral concessions of South Africa.
The problem is that
they did not reckon with the tenacity of white South Africans who love
their country and who do not want to or can not leave. These whites
stay and work themselves to death to appease the ANC
it will be enough to ensure their continued existence in a country
that is going to the dogs. They do not realise that they are persona
non grata in South Africa. The chess game starts to become a bit
clearer once they realise that the end solution is to get rid of all
whites in South Africa.
If the whites do not want to leave
willingly then they should be terrorised into leaving through violent
house invasions, rape, torture, and farm murders. The final solution
will be an all out, full blown genocide of white South Africans. That
is why we see this playoff of racial tensions between white and black
South Africans who are all too ignorant to realise that they are just
white and black pawns in a chess game that they do not understand and
where the wealth of South Africa is the prize. Unless whites leave
South Africa to the last man, they will soon become the targets of
impatient global financiers who are using the blacks as their
instruments to get their hands on our mineral wealth by any means.
It has nothing to do with racism or human rights; it is just
business as usual for the financial elite of the world. Many will say
that the mineral wealth and the marine resources of South Africa was
not the property of the Boers to start with, that it belonged to the
blacks all along, but that is devoid from any truth as I have
explained so far in this series. The Blacks and the Whites were
contemporary settlers of South Africa. The Boers discovered the gold
and the diamonds that the blacks were sitting on and did not even
value. The law of "Finders Keepers" therefore prevails.
Blacks never extracted any gold from ore. The blacks did not eat fish
because they have a fear of the ocean and never even had dug-out
The whites of South Africa started mining and
fishing on a commercial scale and therefore have full claim to these
resources. The selling out of whites and the treason by their own
leaders who were collaborators of these global institutions such as
the Council on Foreign Relations and the Tri-Lateral Commission will
be dealt with in future posts. The shocking truth of how bankers,
countries, large corporations and church organisations ganged up and
mobbed against an anti communist, Christian, sovereign nation will all
Opening Pandora's Apartheid Box - Part 16-The
One of the basic strategies of war is to
find and identify your enemy. If we want to know who the enemies of
South Africa were and who constantly crucified us upside down at the
United Nations for "The Crime of Apartheid", then we should
open a few cans of worms and peek deep down the rabbit-hole
attack against South Africa was never about the abolishment of
Apartheid. It was about the destruction of all western systems of
freedom and democracy. They wanted Western Capitalism to be replaced
with Scientific Socialism. Most people understand the Communist attack
on South Africa, but why the Western World also climbed in and kicked
us while we were down is a bitter pill to swallow and difficult to
understand. We were a pro Western, Capitalist, Nationalist and
Why would the Western World attack us?
Most people refuse to believe that the West can be bad. That the West
can support Communism. "How can Capitalist leaders cut off their
own necks"? they ask
Dr Carrol Quigley wrote a monumental
work on the subject called. "Tragedy and Hope" and the
entire text can be read online. Quigley was a highly respected
professor at Princeton and Harvard Universities. He was the mentor of
Bill Clinton who was one of his students. He was also professor of
history at Georgetown University and did 25 years of in depth research
before he wrote his book. I won't call such a great man a "conspiracy
theorist" rather a realist who saw how deep the rabbit hole goes.
Here is an excerpt from his book "Tragedy and Hope"
"There does exist and has existed for a generation, an
international Anglophile network which operates to some extent in the
way the Radical Right believes the Communists act. In fact, this
network, which we may identify as the Round Table Groups, has no
aversion to cooperating with the Communists, or any other groups, and
frequently does so. I know of the operations of this network because I
have studied it for twenty years and was permitted for two years, in
the early 1960s, to examine its papers and secret records. I have no
aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of my life,
been close to it and to many of its instruments. I have objected, both
in the past and recently, to a few of its policies but in general my
chief difference of opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I
believe its role in history is significant enough to be known."
the same time of Rhodes's death in 1902, Smut's ideas of a Union of
South Africa (that would destroy the two Boer Republics forever) and
Milner surrounding himself with his "Kindergarten"
Wilson became the president of the USA (1913). He is often credited
for his "Fourteen Point plan" and one of the drafters of the
League of Nations, the forerunner to the United Nations for which he
received the Nobel Prize in 1919. The "Presidential Advisors"
The presidency of Woodrow Wilson saw the introduction of what is now
called "The Presidential Advisers" who are still haunting
the White House to this day. It is based on a Boer general namely Jan
Smuts' ideas who was a traitor of South Africa, a collaborator of the
"One World Government" who served on two British war
councils during two world wars as an "Advisor". It started
with a character called Edward Mandell House who was an American
diplomat, politician, and presidential advisor. He was also a Marxist.
Commonly known by the title of Colonel House, although he had no
military experience, he had enormous personal influence with U.S.
President Woodrow Wilson as his foreign policy advisor until Wilson
removed him in 1919. In 1921 He founded the Council on Foreign
Relations (CFR) whose purpose was to communize and destroy the freedom
and independence of the United States, and to lead the country into a
one-world government. In 1912, House wrote the fictional book "Philip
Dru: Administrator" in which he (Dru) was working for "Socialism
as dreamed of by Karl Marx."
In this book, House
planned the conquest of America, telling how both the Democratic and
Republican Parties would be controlled, and be used as instruments in
the creation of a socialistic government. In his fictional perverse
mind, he leads the democratic western U.S. in a civil war against the
plutocratic East, becoming the dictator of America. It is said that
after President Wilson read the book "Philip Dru: Administrator"
he had a stroke and pined into senility and his second wife became the
de facto president of the USA for a while. Every single president of
the USA since Wilson has read the book that Mandell House wrote. House
also asked for the establishment of a state-controlled central bank
which was also proposed in "The Communist Manifesto".
1913, both of these proposals became law. The Federal Reserve Act was
passed, which brought into power a private central bank to create the
money of the United States, taking this power away from the United
States Congress. And the 16th Amendment to the United States
Constitution, (graduated income tax as proposed by Karl Marx), was
also ratified. In 1940, at the invitation of President Roosevelt,
members of the CFR gained domination over the State Department, and
they have maintained this domination ever since. More on this
Another famous one of these "Advisors"
was Bernard Baruch who was of German Jewish origin and advisor to six
presidents of the USA over a period of 60 years. Baruch was also known
as the "Park bench statesman". He preferred to do his
business on a park bench, because he was well aware of bugging
devices. During both World Wars he was ever insistent that "One
man" become the head of an "Advisory Commission" to the
Defense Council of which an investigating commission of Congress in
1919 said, "It served as the secret government of the United
In 1935 he said something that shows what he
had in store for the American people
"had the 1914-1918 war
gone on another year our whole population could have emerged in cheap
but serviceable uniforms", shoe sizes being the only permissible
variation. Mr Baruch in those words revealed his vision of a future
America: a faceless mindless mob allowed only to do labour, provided
with Identity numbers and bread cards - (The Grand design - Douglas
Next up is Harry Lloyd Hopkins , an ulcerous type,
intense, jittering with nerves, a chain smoker , black coffee drinker
and the closest advisor to Franklin D. Roosevelt. This Roosevelt era
is quite significant, because it was at the end of WW2 that Mr.
Hopkins and a guy called Alger Hiss gave half of Europe away to
Communist at the Yalta conference. This period is probably the darkest
days in the history of Europe and it will take generations to recover
from the yoke of Communism. This man Alger Hiss would later be tried
for treason, because he was a communist spy. Alger Hiss was also one
of the founding members of the United Nations. Over the years we would
see many more of these "Advisers", but probably the worst
one of them all would be Henry Kissinger.
Never before in
history have humanity had a larger, more diabolical enemy than Henry
Kissinger. After the United Nations were formed, we saw a series of "No-Win
Wars" against communism, as Douglas Reed, British author,
journalist and playwright calls it in, "The Grand Design"
and "The Siege of South Africa". First one of these "No-Win
Wars" would be Korea where American, British, Australian and
Canadian troops would be sent to fight Communist who was supplied with
aircraft, artillery and amour by "Advisor" Mr. Hopkins.
South Africa, as part of the UN, also sent troops and pilots. It was
When the successful American commander,
MacArthur, wished hotly to pursue a beaten enemy across the Yalu
River, President Harry Truman sacked the general. Korea was portioned
off like Europe and Germany, and the Communists were left with the
Northern half. These "No-Win" wars we saw through from
Korea, Vietnam and Namibia, to present day Iraq and Afghanistan, where
both sides are supplied with weapons and money from the same sides and
profits are made on the corpses of Western White men. But let us look
at some of these organizations that would play major roles in
attacking us in South Africa and who supported Marxist terrorists with
money, training and logistics.
Prof. Quigley calls them "An
Anglophile Network" founded out of the Round Table of Rhodes from
South Africa. Scary to think that this spider web had its origins in
South Africa of all places, but it is all true. Royal Institute for
International Affairs (Chatham House) The RIIA is a British think tank
that absorbed Rhodes' Round Table and Milner's "Kindergarten"
members. It was founded in 1920 and is part of the British
Chatham House holds meetings at which
members, discuss the on goings of world affairs. Over the years many
famous statesmen have spoken to distinguished audiences at Chatham
House. Recent notable speakers include Jack Straw (British Foreign
Secretary) and the Palestinian Prime Minister. Its famous Chatham
House Rule, when invoked, ensures confidentiality of all meeting
participants. The rule currently reads as follows: "When a
meeting or part thereof, is held under the Chatham House Rule,
participants are free to use the information received, but neither the
identity nor the affiliation of the speaker(s), nor that of any other
participant, may be revealed". Council on Foreign Relations Prof.
Carroll Quigley ( who was a CFR member himself) writes in his book, "Tragedy
& Hope": "The CFR is the American Branch of a society
which originated in England, and which believes that national
boundaries should be obliterated, and a one-world rule established."
Admiral Chester Ward, a former member of the CFR for 16 years, warned
the American people of the organization's intentions: "The most
powerful clique in these elitist groups has one objective in common -
they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty of the
national independence of the United States. A second clique of
international members in the CFR comprises the Wall Street
international bankers and their key agents. Primarily, they want the
world banking monopoly from whatever power ends up in the control of
global government." And Dan Smoot, a former member of the FBI
Headquarters staff in Washington, D.C., summarized the organization's
purpose as follows: "The ultimate aim of the CFR is to create a
one-world socialist system, and to make the U.S. an official part of
The CFR's activities are treasonous to the U.S.
Constitution. Their goal is to destroy the United States of America,
and to make the country a part of their global government scheme. It
has to be further remembered that there are over 170 journalists,
correspondents, and communications executives who are members of the
The leaders of 'Time', 'Newsweek', 'Fortune', 'Business
Week', and numerous other publications are CFR members. Its members
have run, or are running, NBC and CBS, 'The New York Times', 'The
Washington Post', 'The Des Moines Register', and many other important
newspapers. The Trilateral Commision In 1973, The Trilateral
Commission was founded by David Rockefeller and Jimmy Carter amongst
others. David Rockefeller is the head of the Chase Manhattan Bank (now
called JP Morgan Chase). He is the grandson of J.D. Rockefeller who
founded Standard Oil.
The Trilateral Commission was kick
started with a donation from the Ford-Foundation to work for the same
goal: a one-world government. The Trilateral Commission's roots stems
from the book, "Between Two Ages", written by Zbigniew
Brzezinski in 1970. In this book, Brzezinski praised Marxism, thought
of the United States as obsolete, and praised the formation of a
one-world government. Senator Barry Goldwater said this of the TC: "The
Trilateral Commission is international and is intended to be the
vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking
interests by seizing control of the political government of the U.S
David Rockefeller appointed Zbigniew Brzezinski to be the Director of
the Trilateral Commission.
The Bilderberg Group David
Rockefeller is also a member of the Bilderberg group, a highly
secretive international think tank who meets annually since 1954. This
group, some believe conspires to foster global government. It was
founded by Joseph Retinger, Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands and
Belgian Prime Minister Paul Van Zeeland. Bilderberg invites 100 (or
more) of "the most powerful people in Europe and North America",
for annual, closed door meetings at five star resorts. The group
stresses secrecy: "What's said at a Bilderberg conference stays
at a Bilderberg conference." Source Another prominent member of
the Bilderberg group is Dr Henry Kissinger who was instrumental in the
downfall of South Africa and a personal friend of Pik Botha, former
Foreign Affairs and Information Minister of South Africa.
can read more and watch some interesting videos at the links below.
Bilderberg group The Tavistock Institute for Human Behaviour The
Tavistock Institute In his book Conspirators' Hierarchy: The Story of
the Committee of 300, Dr. John Coleman, "a former intelligence
agent of British MI6," discusses the The Tavistock Institute for
Human Behaviour. (Founded in 1946 by a grant from the Rockefeller
foundation). The Tavistock Institute developed the mass brainwashing
techniques which were first used experimentally on American prisoners
of war in Korea.
Its experiments in crowd control methods
have been widely used on the American public, a surreptitious but
nevertheless outrageous assault on human freedom by modifying
individual behavior through topical psychology. A German refugee, Kurt
Lewin, became director of Tavistock in 1932. He came to the U.S. in
1933 as a refugee, the first of many infiltrators, and set up the
Harvard Psychology Clinic, which originated the propaganda campaign to
turn the American public against Germany and involve us in World War
II. Coleman states that "All Tavistock and American foundation
techniques have a single goal---to break down the psychological
strength of the individual and render him helpless to oppose the
dictators of the World Order.
There are numerous other
organizations at play in this global game that is marching us on to a
One World Government. They all interlink and who all strive for the
same goal, that of a one world government, but the major player s at
this poker game have been named and will suffice as far as this
article stretches. This rabbit hole is unbelievably deep. The bottom
of which we are still trying to find.
It is only through an
understanding of the position of South Africa and its White population
in the context of these international role players and organizations
that we will be able to understand why South Africa had to be handed
over to Black Marxist terrorist. It is not my aim to expose every
single person or organization who is striving for this "One World
Socialist Utopia". To me it will be sufficient if the reader can
grasp and comprehend that the attack on South Africa had very little
to do with our internal politics of "Separate, but equal
development", today known as "Apartheid".
was an orchestrated plan flowing down from the top of international
globalists; both Communist and Capitalists, who saw South Africa as a
major stone in the path of their march towards a totalitarian one
world government. Not only did we have untold riches in minerals
beneath the soil of or country, not only did we control a major
shipping route around the Cape of Good Hope, but we were also a
shining example of the success of Nationalism as opposed to the
failure of Communism on the rest of the continent and in the rest of
the world. Communism is such a useless self destructing system that
primary school children can grasp the simplicity of its failures.
Without massive financial support from the Western
Capitalists it would soon self destruct and disappear down the toilet
of shit political and economical ideas. The sick Frankenstein Monster
of Communism is plugged into a lifeline from global bankers who
ensures that their creation, their diabolical baby, survives.
good example is the two Portuguese colonies of Angola and Mozambique.
In Angola the Americans supported the mildly communist Dr. Jonas
Savimbi of UNITA against the severely Communist MPLA government with
money and "Stinger" missiles. In Mozambique the Communist
FRELIMO were supported by the Chase Manhattan Bank of David
Rockefeller. The opposition RENAMO, supported from South Africa was
about to take over control in Mozambique at one stage, when David
Rockefeller personally flew in to prop up the Communist FRELIMO
Government. The effect of the carnage that took place in those two
countries is still visible to this day.
To us it will always
seems like a Capatalist/Communist paradox
something that does not
But Author Garry Allen in his book, "None dare
call it Conspiracy" sums it up beautifully on page 32: "If
one understands that socialism is not a share-the-wealth program, but
is in reality a method to consolidate and control the wealth, then the
seeming paradox of superrich men promoting socialism becomes no
paradox at all. Instead it becomes the logical, even the perfect tool
of power-seeking megalomaniacs. Communism, or more accurately,
socialism, is not a movement of the downtrodden masses, but of the
If you wanted to control the nation's
manufacturing, commerce, finance, transportation and natural
resources, you would need only to control the apex, the power
pinnacle, of an all-powerful socialist government. Then you would have
a monopoly and could squeeze out all your competitors. If you wanted a
national monopoly, you must control a national socialist government.
If you want - a worldwide monopoly, you must control a world socialist
government. That is what the game is all about. "Communism"
is not a movement of the downtrodden masses but is a movement created,
manipulated and used by power-seeking billionaires in order to gain
control over the world . . . first by establishing socialist
governments in the various nations and then consolidating them all
through a "Great Merger," into an all-powerful world,
But the ultimate advantage the
creditor has over the king or president is that if the ruler gets out
of line the banker can finance his enemy or rival. Therefore, if you
want to stay in the lucrative king-financing business, it is wise, to
have an enemy or rival waiting in the wings to unseat every king or
president to whom you lend. If the king doesn't have an enemy, you
must create one. And so my dear readers were an enemy created. That "Enemy"
was "Apartheid" and the whites of South Africa who upheld
it. In the next edition we will look at the dream of Smuts and Rhodes
that we today know as the nightmare of the United Nations and the
hypocrisy of nations who slagged us off and turned us into the skunks
of the world, You will be shocked past your bones to your soul
Opening Pandora's Apartheid Box - Part 27 - The
Internationalists setting the stage for the Utimate $ell-out
the P.W. Botha's disastrous Rubicon Speech, the USA passed the
Comprehensive Anti Apartheid Act or (CAAA). (passed by the Senate 78
to 21, the House by 313 to 83) It was the last straw. The isolation of
and sanctions against South Africa were the worst that any country in
the world had endured up until that time. It was total it was
complete. No more Mr. Nice Guy;no more carrot, only stick. President
Ronald Reagan tried to veto the CAAA, but congress would have nothing
of it. This override marked the first time in the twentieth century
that a president had a foreign policy veto overridden.
would be amongst other things a ban on all loans to South Africa, even
to black owned charities and companies. A ban on all exports to South
Africa including fuel, crude oil, weapons, technology such as
computers and services to the police and army. A ban on all imports
from SA such as steel coal, arms, farm products uranium, textiles.
There was a permanent ban on the import of Kruger Rands. South African
Airways planes could not land anywhere in the USA anymore. And to
drive the message homeCongress approved a $40 million "Assistance
to those harmed by Apartheid" donation&;
more money from the the West to aid the Marxist terrorist ANC, SACP
and PAC. The act also required that a report from the president be
made every twelve months. If "Substantial progress" was not
made;more sanctions would follow. Including the seizing of deposit
accounts of South African citizens abroad. These sanctions could only
be lifted under five conditions.
1. The release of Nelson
Mandela and all so called "Political Prisoners"
Marxist terrorists, Communist agitators, bomb planters, saboteurs and
mass murderers who caused atrocities against the all the citizens of
South Africa including blacks, coloureds, whites and everyone
inbetween. 2. The repeal of the State of Emergency and the release of
all persons detained under it. 3. The unbanning of "Democratic
political parties" and the permission of free political process.
4. The repeal of the Group Areas Act and the Population Reggistration
Act. 5. Agreement "To enter into good faith negotiations with
truly representative members of the black majority without
Not only did the NP government
experience pressure from the entire world instituting severe
sanctions, sports and cultural boycotts against it, it also
experienced pressure from big business inside South Africa. Shortly
after the Rubicon speech, in September 1985, Gavin Relly of Anglo
American led a delegation to Lusaka to have talks with the ANC greatly
enhancing the status and international standing of the banned
classed by the CIA at the time as one of
the ten most dangerous terrorist organizations in the world.
Rosholt of the gigantic Barlows group in October 1985 went chest to
chest with P.W. Botha. P.W. previously told business leaders that they
"should stick to business and leave politics to the politicians".
Rosholt made it clear to P.W. Botha that in South Africa there was no
longer any clear distinction between political and socio-economic
issues. They were inextricably linked.
In 1987 Chris Ball of
Barclays bank financially assisted the ANC by placing an advertisement
in several English newspapers on the organization`s 75th birthday.
They also made loans to the ANC. P.W. Botha ordered an inquiry and
charged Chris Ball. Justice Munnik of the Cape Supreme Court found
that, despite his denials to the contrary, Chris Ball was fully
informed beforehand what these loans would be for. Ball resigned and
emigrated to the UK. So did Tony Bloom of the Premier Group and Gordon
Waddell, CEO of Anglo-Vaal and former son in law of Harry Oppenheimer,
owner of Anglo American who was also the greatest shareholder in
Barclays Bank. Harry Oppenheimer maintained that he had no prior
knowledge of or granted approval for the Gordon Relly trip to Lusaka.
It has to be added that before 1994 Anglo American controlled about
80% of all the stock on the Johannesburg stock Exchange. Today, 17
years later, they still control about 80% of all the stock on the
Johannesburg Stock Exchange.
In 1987 Dr Van Zyl Slabbert of
the Progressive Federal Party led a delegation of 60 academics and
influential whites to talks with the banned ANC in Senegal. This was
in total defiance of the NP government. Inside South Africa society
was threatened by another monster, the Introduction of the Maoist "People's
War" and Operation Vula the ANC/SACP. Operation Vula (Vula means
open-up in Xhosa) was commanded by Mac Maharaj an Indian Communist. It
was the decision of the ANC to shift their focus from 20% Civilian
targets to 80% civilian targets.
The result was chaos and
brutal mass murder of black citizens accused of disloyalty by the ANC
Marxist terrorists. The now famous necklace method was used daily to
kill so called informers and terrorize the black population into
supporting the ANC. A state of emergency was declared to restore law
and order. Outside of South Africa, on the Angolan Border with Namibia
the combined Communist forces of Cuba, The MPLA, East German and
Russian military advisers were launching major offensives against
UNITA a South African ally, but were thoroughly defeated at the Lomba
River or what was later dubbed the Battle of Cuito Cuanavale.
over the world mass Rock music concerts calling for the freeing of
Mandela and the ending of Apartheid. To make things worse for the
National Party, the Right was on the rise. In 1982 another threat
arose caused by P.W. Botha himself. The Conservative Party of Dr.
Andries Treurnicht was created after the Conservatives in the National
Party split off. They were strongly opposed to P.W. Botha's policies
of "Power Sharing" with blacks. They started gaining so much
popularity that they became the official opposition on 6th of May 1987
displacing the liberal PFP by gaining 27% of the support. The liberal
PFP could only muster 14% of the vote.
The NP since they
came to power was always on the right of the opposition
first time since 1948 the National Party found themselves, left of the
opposition. The NP had 52,3% of the vote. Nevertheless the NP thought
that this gave them a mandate to continue the process of handing power
over to the Blacks, because 52,3% and 14% from the PFP as well as the
2% of the New Republican Party basically ensured a two thirds majority
on the LEFT of the political spectrum. Their assumption was wrong
in fact. Nevertheless, not only did South Africa face massive
escalations of Communist agitated terrorism and violence threatening
civil war from inside the country, but also an amassing of Communist
conventional forces and onslaught from outside, but the worst was that
Western Capitalist from outside South Africa as well as from inside
were financing the Marxist terrorists.
Never in the known
history of the white race has the ENTIRE WORLD ganged up against such
a tiny nation of five million whites, mostly Christians, such as they
did towards the end of twentieth century at the Southern tip of
Africa. In September 1989, when F.W. de Klerk took over from his
predecessor P.W. Botha, South Africa was on the ropes. The South
African currency had fallen to 36 US cents, compared to $1.40 a decade
ago. Unemployment lines were growing daily. Prices in stores were
soaring. The inflation rate stood at 16%. At the centre of South
Africa's problems at the time stood a national debt of $20.5 billion
In October 1989 the American Assistant Secretary for
African Affairs, Herman Jay Cohen warned De Klerk that the new Bush
administration would institute punitive measures of its own unless
South Africa took legislative action before June 1990 to abolish
Apartheid. In 1992 during the Angolan elections, Cohen would declare
the elections free and fair despite all other observers disputing this
and the evidence of major electoral fraud to the contrary evincing.
Shortly after this Cohen resigned and went to work for the Angolan
government as a foreign agent and later also worked for the mass
murderer Robert Mugabe as a foreign agent. Nevertheless, after F.W. de
Klerk came to power, he was basically given six months to end
Apartheid or South Africa would, economically and therefore
militarily, be destroyed.
The severity of sanctions against
South Africa is contained in three books, namely "In Sight of
surrender" by Les de Villiers, "South Africa: The sanctions
report", by The Commonwealth Secretariat and "Race for
Sanctions", by Francis Njubi Nesbitt. There can be no doubt that
these sanctions crippled South Africa. It was hurting to the bone.
Later on, De Klerk would consistently deny the impact of sanctions on
South Africa, but the truth is rather different.
however a very good reason for De Klerk's denial at the time
will be revealed later. For now, it is important for us to consider
the circumstances of the time, because this was the reality of the
situation faced by President F.W. de Klerk and the other NP "Talking
Heads" on SABC television such as Barend du Plessis, Pik Botha
and Chris Heunis at the time. It cannot be emphasized any more
the time de Klerk came to power South Africa was on the ropes, being
pummeled and pounded by about 150 other nations across the world.
Friends were scarce
We were on our own. The message was clear, "Give
the country over to blacks UNCONDITIONALLY or face complete ruin."
Opening Pandora's Apartheid Box Part 32. Who does the land
I know, I am digressing wildly. With my last
chapter I was on the betrayal of the country by F. W. de Klerk and his
henchmen. I should have included this chapter a lot earlier. I assumed
that this information to be so well known that it I did not have to
include it in my book. I apologize to my readers and followers for
veering off on a tangent here. Nevertheless, the truth has to be
spoken and if you bear with me it will shock you.
refrain from giving attention to a self-aggrandizing, nappy-wearing
fool such as Julias Malema. I have more important things to write
about or do with my life than to spend time on an uncivilized,
illiterate, petulant toddler, but this escaped clown from the ANC
circus has gotten up the noses of some of my readers and white folk in
South Africa with his remarks about nationalization and grabbing white
owned farmland in South Africa so I thought it well to settle a few
issues by educating him and also those who are worried about his
ramblings and verbal bowel movements.
What got my attention
is the fact that Dr. Gregory Stanton of Genocide Watch moved South
Africa up to stage six of the eight stages of Genocide last week after
Malema, the leader of the ANC youth league threatened to confiscate
white owned farms without compensation. His reason being that whites
stole the land from blacks in the first place through colonization and
legislation such as the Native Lands Act of 1913. Worse was that a
sudden Rush of whites wanted to emigrate because of his claptrap.
Nevertheless, anybody with the elementary knowledge of history, law
and politics in South Africa knows that this is utter junk, not even
worthy of a second thought, but clearly Malema is preaching to his
fellow low-browed, plebian followers who gives him a courtesy-suck
every time he masturbates their African victimhood, which is nothing
else but an excuse for their self-induced failure and right to milk
whites until "Jesus comes".
I have no problem if
someone wants to emigrate because of unfair laws such AA or BEE. I
have no problem if anybody feels they can no longer live under a
heavily biased socialist government and pay taxes to them. I have no
problem with anybody feeling that they need to emigrate because of the
government clamping down on freedom of speech and the right to own
property. But I do have a problem with someone wanting to run away
from a limp-wristed coward and his gang, because when the fight starts
I will be there in the front line. I pray for that day. Let us
The Lies There is a common belief in South
Africa that the Natives Land Act of 1913 shoved blacks on reserves (7%
of the land) and prohibited them from buying land in white areas. That
whites forcibly removed them to these reserves and that these reserves
were on the worst land in the country with no mineral riches and that
whites kept all the best land and minerals for themselves. Now if I
was a black man, I would probably also want to believe that myth,
because it would ensure me eternal victimhood status and compensation
for generations to come.
Unfortunately, it is a blatant lie
and can be attributed to the lack of reading ability or legal
comprehension of the journalists and historians of our time. First of
all the biggest Platinum reserves in the world runs through the former
Black homeland of Bophuthatswana. The former Nationalist government
had no problem allocating this area to the Tswanas for self rule,
although they already had a massive country called Botswana given to
them by the British. It was originally part of South Africa, called
Bechuanaland. Blacks further got another two massive countries from
the British called Lesotho and Swaziland. There goes their 7%.
Lie number two corrected. Black homelands were on the worst land in
South Africa. When one compares the rainfall map of South Africa and
anybody with elementary knowledge of South Africa will tell you that
the largest part of South Africa is called the Karoo. It is a semi
dessert comparable to Arizona or Nevada in the USA. Blacks never even
entered this area let alone settle it.
Whites made it
blossom and created successful sheep farms producing meat of world
quality. Black "Settlements" are found on the north and east
coast of South Africa. The East Coast having a sub tropical climate
and the north a prairie-like climate with summer rainfall and thunder
storms. An exception to this is the Western Cape with a Mediterranean
climate and winter rainfall. The northern and eastern part of South
Africa with its beautiful green grasslands and fertile soil is where
the blacks eventually coalesced and this is the land they chose for
themselves. Their eventual homelands were found on the land they
inhabited out of their own free will.
The Afrikaners even
have a song praising the greenness of Natal, called " Groen is
die land van Natal" ( Green is the land of Natal).It was perfect
grazing area for the cattle herding blacks.
three, Blacks are indigenous to South Africa and first settled it.
Today Blacks in South Africa often tell Afrikaners and other
minorities such as the Coloureds, Indians, Chinese or Jews to adapt to
their misrule and corruption or "Go Home"
we, who have been born here, who holds legal citizenship through
successive birthrights should emigrate to Europe, Malaysia, India or
Israel. That the only ones who have a legal claim to South Africa, all
of it, are the blacks.
Blacks believe that they are
indigenous to South Africa when they are not and this has been proven
by DNA research. We are ALL settlers in South Africa. All South
Africans are settlers, regardless of their skin colour, and their DNA
carries the proof. So says Dr Wilmot James, head of the African Genome
Project, a distinguished academic, sociologist and, more recently,
honorary professor of human genetics at the University of Cape Town.
Apart from a few scattered archeological remains found of black
culture in the far northern Transvaal prior to 1652, it is generally
agreed that Blacks and Whites were contemporary settlers of South
I use the term "Settler" loosely, because
blacks never settled South Africa, their presence was nomadic. Blacks
were mere itinerants who traveled from place to place with no fixed
home. Whole capital "cities" of grass huts could be moved if
grazing was exhausted.
They had no demarcated areas, no
fences, no borders, no maps, no title deeds to proof ownership of any
land apart from a verbal claim and mutual understanding that their
temporary presence in a certain area in a certain period of time
constituted "ownership" of the land.
behind no foundations of buildings, no statues, no roads, no rock
paintings, not a single proof of "settlement" of the land,
prior to the Whites settling South Africa. The only rock paintings
were made by the Bushmen and the Hottentots (Khoi-Khoi and San) in the
caves they temporarily occupied. Blacks were pastoral-nomads and the
Bushmen/Hottentots were hunter-gatherer-nomads.
the other hand built cities, railroads, dams and a first world country
comparable to the best in Europe and the new world
speaks of a people who intended to live there for a thousand years, if
not eternity. To claim that the whole of Africa belongs to Blacks is
It is like an Italian claiming the whole of Europe
belongs to Italians, including Norway. In fact, the pyramids of Egypt
is proof of white settlement going back thousands of years, so is that
of the Phoenicians settling in Carthage and the Greeks settling in
Alexandria. The Arabs settled North Africa soon after the Prophet
Mohammed died and the whites settled Southern Africa from 1652
Today there are three Africa's as Dr. Eschel
Rhoodie calls it in his book "The Third Africa" (1968)
up north, Black in the centre and Whites at the south. The White
settlers of the Cape first came face to face with the Bantu around
1770 on the banks of the Great Fish River, 120 years after Van
Riebeeck came to the Cape and 1000 km east of Cape Town. Lie number
four, Whites created black reserves and homelands. The TruthBlacks
created the homelands themselves, thanks to Shaka. The common belief
is that the black tribes at the time were all living peacefully and in
the spirit of Ubuntu with each other in a virtual liberal paradise.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
The Zulu tyrant,
Shaka, at the time was committing genocide against other tribes.
Wiping out an estimated 2 million people in what is now known as the
Defecane (great scattering).
The Swazis and the Ndebeles
fled back north in the direction of central Africa where they migrated
from. The Sotho's fled into the mountains of what is today, Lesotho.
The rest of the smaller tribes huddled together trying to find
strength in coalescing. That is the history of black South Africans
that blacks prefer to ignore
that blacks drove other blacks of
their land, not whites. It is into this Maelstrom of black chaos that
the Boers trekked in 1838.
As far as they went they found
large open sections of country uninhabited by anyone. Black tribes
fleeing Shaka's carnage grouped themselves into areas finding
protection in concentrated numbers. This is how Sir Theophilus
Shepstone later found them huddled together on self created reserves.
He just demarcated it in order to protect them from each other. The
creators of the Bantustans were not the Boers or the Whites, it was a
black man called Shaka. Did Whites simply take over black land? The
answer is no.
The elaborate answer can be found in a letter
written by the congregation of the short lived Boer Republic of
Lydenburg in the name of Dominee A, Smith from Uitenhage in 1860 after
continuous accusations by the Cape Government and the Dutch Reform
Church that the Voortrekkers were stealing black land and not
converting the indigenous people to Christianity. It is documented in
the book, "Kerkverraad" by François Richter and Dr X
on page 98. The letter was first published on Tuesday, 3rd of April
1860 in "De Oude Emigrant" Potchefstroom.
freely translate (and not verbatim) the sections of importance.
"We are are members of a "Volk" (nation)
that is attacked and despised by you today. You attacked our rights
and our dignity. We are the people who gave up all our belongings in a
search of a country of our own where we can govern ourselves, just
like you want to govern yourselves. You refer to us leaving the Cape
Colony as if we wanted to withdraw ourselves from civilization. You
accuse us that we do not act as missionaries and force Christianity on
a people who do not wishes it upon themselves. You ask, "Did the
Almighty tell our Commandant general to stand up and take ownership of
the land?" Our answer is that the largest area of the current
British Colony, Natal and the Free State were legally bought by by the
Dutch immigrants from the former legal "Kaffir tribes" (sic)
who lived on it. A section was taken over by legally fought wars, wars
that were caused by the Natives. When the Dutch Immigrants found
themselves in 1836 landless between the Vet and Vaal River, they
bought the land from the natives.
While peace were
established with the "Kaffir tribes" surrounding them,
Mozilikatze and the Zulus or Matabeles attacked us without warning
killing defenseless women and children on land we already bought from
them and stole everything they could find. When Chief Commandant
Potgieter arrived back from his trip to Delagoa Bay and saw the
murdered families he did what you and I and every other person would
have done, he annihilated the enemy.
Under Piet Retief a
large section of Natal was bought from the Zulu King, Dingane, who
without warning killed 70 men. They then proceeded to kill (at
Bloukrans) every white man woman and child they could find. Under a
small group of Kommandant General Pretorius the Zulus were defeated
(At Blood River). In 1845 a large section of land in the area of
Ohrigstad was bought from the natives and in 1846 they bought another
section of land from the "Kaffir King" "Omswaas".
In 1854 another section of land between the Buffels and
Pongola Rivers now Utrecht, was bought from the Panda and a year later
they bought another section of land from Omswaas north of the Pongola
River. And with this, the question of how we, the "Despicable
Dutchmen", took ownership of our land is answered". End of
The Shocking Truth about the Native Land Act of 1913
Most credible historical sources and journalistic contributions such
as Allister Spark's book, "The mind of South Africa, The story of
the rise and fall of Apartheid" selectively omits the truth about
the Natives Land Act of 1913. I will now expose and reveal the truth.
This law is often quoted by pseudo historians and liberal
propagandists to "prove" how "Whites" in South
Africa dispossessed "blacks" of their land.
takes this law under the loop.
From the start when one
researches the 1913 Native Land Act one is confronted with several
ironies. The act was brought in by Minister J.W. Sauer, a Cape Liberal
and Minister of Native Affairs who opposed disenfranchisement of
blacks and was widely considered a friend of the Blacks.
Tengo Jabavu, a prominent "educated African" and editor
since 1876 of the first Xhosa newspaper Isigidimi Sama Xosa ("The
Xhosa Messenger") welcomed the Act. How then can this act today
be considered as "The original Apartheid Sin"? It is largely
through the writings of Sol Plaatje. Despite his Coloured or Dutch
sounding name, Solomon Tshekiso Plaatje (1876-1932) was a Tswana. He
was a black intellectual and writer who could speak seven languages
including Dutch and German and who translated Shakespeare into Tswana.
He was editor and part-owner of Koranta ea Becoana (Bechuana Gazette)
in Mafikeng, and in Kimberley, Tsala ea Becoana (Bechuana Friend) and
Tsala ea Batho (The Friend of the People). Plaatje was the first black
South African to write a novel in English - Mhudi, (1919).
1914 he wrote a book called, "Native Life in South Africa",
full of anecdotal "evidence" of black dispossession in South
Africa. Hardly any real evidence that would stand up in a court of law
It is this work that is used by one-eyed academics,
liberals and historians to prove their case of how whites dispossessed
blacks of their land and the origin of the "Whites-stole-black-land"
myth perpetuated by ANC propagandists and more recently by Nobel
Laureate for Woodwork and un-distinguished academic, Julias Malema.
Prior to this act, in 1906, the various black tribes complained to the
British Government that whites and Indians and other Black tribes, but
most importantly Companies, bought land on their reserves and fearing
this encroachment, they rioted. Because of this, a young black lawyer
educated at Oxford and Columbia Universities, named Pixley Seme called
various African Chiefs together and started in 1912, the African
National Congress or the ANC.
The government of the day
appointed a commission to investigate the situation, called the Lagden
Commission. It is on the recommendations of this commission that the
Native Lands Act of 1913 was founded. The original Act
Lands Act of 1913 can be viewed Here. Please download it before it
disappears down the Orwellian "memory hole". It starts off
with, "To make further provision as to the purchase and leasing
of Land by Natives and other Persons in the several parts of the Union
and for other purposes in connection with the ownership and occupation
of Land by Natives and other Persons."
At the time, the
word "Native" was probably used for Blacks and "Other
Persons" probably referred to Whites, Indians, Coloureds, etc,
but that is pure speculation. The act says
shall mean any person, male or female, who is a member of an
aboriginal race or tribe of Africa". By that definition,
Afrikaners definitely qualify, seeing that the group, their language
and their culture originated in South Africa.
settlers always held on to their European roots, Afrikaners cut their
ties to Europe. They even named themselves and their language after
the continent. The law further distinguishes native companies
shall further include any company or other body of persons, corporate
or unincorporate, if the persons who have a controlling interest
therein are natives"
That means any company
founded on South African soil by Afrikaners or any other natives,
including banks or mines could buy land from each other. Nowhere in
this Law does it specifically refer to Blacks and Whites.
does it say that Blacks could not buy White land or vice versa. It
then carries on and says, "1. (1) From and after the commencement
of this Act, land outside the scheduled native areas shall, until
Parliament, acting upon the report of the commission appointed under
this Act, shall have made other provision, be subjected to the
following provisions, that is to say: -- Except with the approval of
the Governor-General -- a. a native shall not enter into any agreement
or transaction for the purchase, hire, or other acquisition from a
person other than a native, of any such land or of any right thereto,
interest therein, or servitude thereover; and b. a person other than a
native shall not enter into any agreement or transaction for the
purchase, hire, or other acquisition from a native of any such land or
of any right thereto, interest therein, or servitude thereover. "
Here one has to understand already that the law, just like all
Apartheid laws, use to cut both ways. It was perfectly fair.
that the law never specifically referred to Whites or Blacks. It only
refers to "Natives" and "A person other than a native".
Not only could "other persons" not buy "Native Land",
but also that, "Natives" could not buy "Other Person's"
As I have said. The act was 100% fair. But right in the
beginning it says, "Except with the approval of the
" That means that there was an escape
The law stipulates that Black tribes could still buy
white land subject to evaluation of a committee and the approval of
the Governor General
And boy did the blacks buy land
Recently a study has been made by two distinguished academics,
Professors Feinberg and Horn, that totally blows this theory about
black land dispossession by whites apart.
It is called:
SOUTH AFRICAN TERRITORIAL SEGREGATION: NEW DATA ON AFRICAN FARM
PURCHASES, 1913-1936 I suggest you download this data from the PDF
link provided for future reference before it disappears off the
internet and down the memory hole. * Harvey Feinberg is Professor
Emeritus of History, Southern Connecticut State University, New Haven,
and Research Collaborator, Department of History, University of
Pretoria. * André Horn is Associate Professor of Geography,
University of Pretoria. A reference to this study can also be found at
the following link, written by a black journalist called Jacob Dlamini
of Bussiness Day, Was Natives Land Act SA's original political sin?
This study proves that contrary to common belief, the 1913
Lands Act resulted in MORE land for blacks not LESS. The act resulted
in Blacks increasing their land ownership by 65%. This is conveniently
ignored and omitted from contemporary history. It proves that at the
time Black tribes were farming right next to Whites. It proves that
whites were renting land from blacks and vice versa. Sometimes Whites
and Blacks were farming on the same land in total symbioses without
interference from government, taking care of each other and their
shared livestock. Liberal journalist Allister Sparks also acknowledges
this in his book, "The Mind of South Africa". The study by
Feinberg and Horn further proves that the Nationalist government of
Barry Hertzog allotted far more white land to blacks than the liberal
government of Louis Botha and Jan Smuts.
Today, it is
believed that the Nationalists brought nothing constructive to South
Africa. The Nationalists are vilified to kingdom come by journalists
and historians alike. The truth is rather different. Quoting from
"Between 1913 and 1936, for example,
Africans bought about 3200 farms and lots outside of native areas.
What's more, the 1913 act was not retroactive, meaning that Africans
who already owned land outside of the native reserves could not have
it taken away from them.
Feinberg and Horn say that between
1913 and 1924, under the governments of Louis Botha and Jan Smuts,
there were 302 exemptions granted, amounting to 35% of the total.
Between 1924 and 1936, when JB Hertzog was in power, there were 565
exemptions granted, amounting to 65% of the total. " In effect
what happened is that blacks could congregate into a group and call
themselves a tribe, appoint a "headman" and thus buy white
land on a "willing buyer willing seller basis". Was this
legal? Was it ethical? Was it mafia-like conspiracy to steal and
encroach on White land? Who stole the land from whom
or was there
no stealing whatsoever? It is this age old system of "Willing
buyer; Willing seller" created by whites and black South Africans
themselves that the ANC and Julias Malema want to do away with today.
The ANC wants to steal all the land. It is this interference with the
lives of the citizens of the country that we have a problem with;
black and white alike.
The further the ANC or any government
for that matter stays away from us the better. We will solve our own
problems. That includes the United Nations, The Common Wealth and The
African Union. Stuff them all. We South Africans will find the
solutions to our own problems.
What this study proves, is
that White South Africans especially Afrikaners and Blacks, sorted out
their issues with each other decades ago. They were enemies; they
fought bitter wars against each other. Then they became friends. They
lived and farmed side by side with each other, respecting each other.
They came to common agreements of "Live and let live" and "Each
to his own"
until the internationalist and their Communist
agitators with their self interest and view on self enrichment by
stealing the mineral wealth from all South Africans played the one off
against the other.
South Africa is at the moment at a
crossroads. There is the rough road and there is the smooth road. We
as the reasonable whites and blacks of South Africa can choose to
co-exist with each other as we have done for the last four hundred
years and as we have decided in 1994 or we can choose to go to war
with each other.
Fact is that the Afrikaners can take a lot,
but sooner or later they also reach the "Gatvol" stage.
Sooner or later even the strongest ox gets tired. When the Afrikaners
are fed-up, they have never backed down when it comes to a fight for
their existence and their place in the sun
and they have always
produced a good account of themselves.
Whether it was the
Mighty Zulu Empire at Blood River, the Mighty British Empire in the
Anglo-Boer War or the Mighty Communist Empire in Angola
is for sure, you do not scratch the balls of a sleeping lion with a
thorny twig. When he wakes, do not beg for mercy.
that, when all the historical facts, truths and lies have been laid
bare in front of reasonable people, it still means nothing. The ANC do
not even hold themselves by their own Freedom Charter that says "South
Africa belongs to all who live in it, black and white." Or that "The
rights of the people shall be the same, regardless of race, colour or
The ANC today practices unequal laws of
Affirmative Action and Black Economic Empowerment, quotas in
university entrance and sport
How in God's name do they expect us
to take them seriously when they preach "Equality" but
In the study of revolution, Crane
Briton was a master who wrote the book "Anatomy of a Revolution".
He analyzed the various stages of revolution based on various case
studies. All revolutions passes through these stages from the "Old
Order" to a "Moderate Regime" to a "Radical regime",
to "Thermidorian reaction" which is a reaction to the
brutality and the excesses of the revolution. In the light of the
current ANC acknowledged "National Democratic Revolution" I
will leave it up to the reader to decide in which faze we are in.
Crane Briton says in his book that it is the "Great
Haters", the single-minded men of heroic emotions, who eventually
rides revolutions to their successful conclusions. It is the focused
minds of young tigers who are not distracted from their ultimate goal,
who are willing to kill en masse, who are willing to risk their lives
and who are willing to die for their cause who will eventually rule
Fortunately we are not that far yet, but we are
close... When the Blacks sing, "Hamba kahleUmkhonto"... Go,
go well, Umkhonto, Umkhonto, Umkhonto we Sizwe. We,we the people of
Umkhonto, Are ready to kill the Boers... Are they talking
reconciliation? Are they willing to work towards a commonly shared
country by all South Africans? I do not think so.
Zuma sings "Bring me my machine gun" does he intend to use
that machine gun on Blacks? Obviously not. When Julias Malema
regurgitate the words of Peter Mokaba and sings "Kill the Boer;
Kill the Farmer" and millions of blacks laud him...what do they
think goes through the minds of the young Afrikaners? I can tell
Malema what the Afrikaners think and how they behave. The ANC is shit
scared of the right wing Afrikaners, the AWB...they see them as their
greatest threat. They are wrong.
Let me tell you how it goes
at an Afrikaner social gathering or braai. Obviously there are the
Rightwing fanatics who want to shoot everything and who want to blow
up everything to do with the ANC and "Kaffirs".
are the ones who wants to take it to the streets in mass action and
want to Toi-Toi ala Kaffir and go and demonstrate in front of the
Union Buildings with pickets in their hands.
Then there are
the "New Liberal Afrikaners" who make up the biggest part of
the Afrikaners today. These are the youngsters and housewives
brainwashed by liberal bullshit radio and tellevision who praise
Mandela as a demi-god and who believe in the "Rainbow Nation
Bullshit...and who listens to Jack Parrow and "Die Antwoord"....They
are zeros on a contract.
Then right at the back you will see
a quiet "Old Ballie" who does not say a word. In fact he
only listens and looks somewhat bored, yawning and checking out his
finger nails. When prompted for an opinion he dislodges an old liberal
Greek philosophical quote that no-one has heard of or can comprehend
before reverting back to his quiet observing state... reservedly
smiling at the audience, drinking in their ignorance and stupidity.
This is the man the ANC should actually be scared of, because he is an
"Old Liberal"...one who has been around the block and knows
that bullshit baffles brains. What goes on in his mind, nobody knows
and he won't share with anybody else. He is the man who slowly and
quietly chips away at the block and if needs be has a lifetime of
education and experience to make a decisive difference when the time
He is the one who knows that survival of the species
do not rest on a few Recce Special forces who can survive for two
weeks on eating grasshoppers and Mopani worms. He is the one who knows
that survival does not depend on success in a few glorious battles
such as Blood River, Majuba, Spioen-Kop or the Lomba river...No. He is
the one who knows that survival takes a long term view. A view of a
chess player thinking eight moves ahead all the time...A vision of
seeing your nation in fifty years from now...two hundred years from
In ancient Rome, when a glorious General returned from
battle, The Romans had a massive parade down the main street. The
General would ride in on a chariot to the thunderous applause of the
citizens...to his side would be a subject, whispering in his ear..."You
are only human, You are only human..." Certain people in the ANC
have forgotten that they are only human. That the same people who have
put them into power can take that power away at the drop of a hat.
Many years ago I watched the sitcom, "The Cosby-show"
where Dr. Huxtable's son gave him uphill. In the end he lost it and
told his son, "Remember that I gave you life, I brought you into
this world and that I can take it away". This is the lesson
Julias Malema and the ANC still needs to learn.
But when all
is said and done, "Might is right"...Africa taught us that
lesson. Shaka did not care about political debates or philosophy.
Alexander the Great might have listened on occasion to Aristotle of
Stagira, but when it came to the crunch, Alexander was the first man
over the wall of an enemy city thrusting a blade between the ribs of
an enemy soldier while the philosophers were pondering back home about
the existence of life.
Whether it was Genghis Khan, Attila
the Hun, Julius Caesar, Napoleon or Shaka...the ones who eventually
conquer the land are the ones who are willing to take it by force.
Holding on to that land for a thousand years is the realm of the
philosophers and the warrior poets.
At the moment things are
really hotting up in South Africa. All the whites have a feeling of
the time is near now. The situation is almost unbearable at the
moment...like a cyst waiting to explode, whites are bracing themselves
for the onslaught to come. Whatever Malema hoped his rhetoric would
achieve is having the counter effect.
Whites are uniting
like never before. They are finally starting to recognize a common
enemy. For his sake I hope he has the will and dedication to pull
through what he wants to start, this time it will be all or nothing,
there will be no half measures. No mercy.